Review: topical agents for cord care have not been shown to be effective in newborn infants in developed countries [commentary on Zupan J, Garner P. Routine topical umbilical cord care at birth (COCHRANE REVIEWS, latest version 29 Jan 1998). In: the Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software].

Question: Are topical agents for umbilical cord care effective for preventing cord infection, illness, and death in newborn infants in developed countries? Data sources: Studies were identified using the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Library, Medlin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Evidence Based Nursing pp. 112 - 114
Autor principal: Rush J
Formato: abstract commentary systematic review Journal Article
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Oct1998
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107221103&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107221103
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13676539
        C0J
      jtl: Evidence Based Nursing
      issn: 13676539
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct1998
      pid: 8280
      pub: BMJ Publishing Group
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107221103
        107221103
        1999072968
        107221103
      ppf: 112
      ppct: 2
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Review: topical agents for cord care have not been shown to be effective in newborn infants in developed countries [commentary on Zupan J, Garner P. Routine topical umbilical cord care at birth (COCHRANE REVIEWS, latest version 29 Jan 1998). In: the Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software].
      aug:
        au: Rush J
        affil: Assistant Clinical Professor, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Umbilical Cord
          Infection Prevention and Control
          Antiinfective Agents Therapeutic Use
          Antibiotics Administration and Dosage
          Infant, Newborn
          Bacterial Colonization In Infancy and Childhood
          Time Factors
          Powders
          Administration, Topical
          Patient Satisfaction
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          Meta Analysis
          Treatment Outcomes
          Clinical Trials
          Research Methodology
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
      ab: Question: Are topical agents for umbilical cord care effective for preventing cord infection, illness, and death in newborn infants in developed countries? Data sources: Studies were identified using the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and contact with the World Health Organisation and experts in the field. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials were included if they studied newborn infants of any gestation using any of the following cord care interventions: topical antiseptic applications (alcohol, triple dye, silver sulphadiazine, acraflavine, iodine, chlorhexidine, or gentian violet), antibiotic applications (bacitracin, nitrofurazone, or tetracycline), powders with or without antiseptics, single or multiple applications to the cord area, washing the whole baby or dry care, and care of the cord compared with no care. Data extraction: Data were extracted on study quality; country of study; infant characteristics and numbers; interventions; primary outcomes of cord infection (redness, swelling, or smell), disseminated bacterial infection (fever, meningitis, or septic foci), or death; and secondary outcomes of time to separation, bacterial colonisation, and maternal satisfaction with intervention. Main results: 10 studies met the selection criteria. All included healthy term infants and were done in developed countries (USA, Norway, Canada, Israel, and UK). Cord infection was not affected by use of antiseptics (alcohol, benzine, or 2 strengths of chlorhexidine) (4 studies) or dosed dressing compared with open care (I study compared hydrophobic gauze bandage with daily application of weak chlorhexidine). No systemic bacterial infections or deaths were seen in any of the studies reviewed. Times to separation of cord were approximately 7 days for powder (I study), 8 days for no intervention (2 studies), 10 days for alcohol (2 studies), 12 days for antibiotics (2 studies), 8-16 days for triple dye, and 11- 14 days for silver sulphadiazine. Meta-analysis showed that bacterial colonisation was unaffected by benzine and weak solution of chlorhexidine and was reduced by strong chlorhexidine solution, silver sulphadiazine, and triple dye (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.36) (4 studies). No statistically significant differences were shown in colorusation when comparing antibiotics with antiseptics (1 study), dosed dressing compared with open care (I study), and total body wash compared with dry care (I study). Maternal satisfaction was higher with use of antiseptics (OR 0.45, CI 0.31 to 0.66) (1 study). Conclusion: Data are inconclusive for determining whether topical agents are safe and effective for umbilical cord care in healthy infants in developed countries. [Original article accession number: 1999023323]
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        abstract
        commentary
        systematic review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N