Cumulative trauma disorders in the upper extremities: reliability of the Postural and Repetitive Risk-Factors Index.

OBJECTIVE: This study addresses test-retest reliability of the Postural and Repetitive Risk-Factors Index (PRRI) for work-related upper body injuries. This assessment was developed by the present authors. DESIGN: A repeated measures design was used to assess the test-retest reliability of a videotap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Vol. 78; no. 8; pp. 860 - 867
Autores principales: James CPA, Harburn KL, Kramer JF
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: W B Saunders 1997 Aug
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107240243&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107240243
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039993
        1XL
      jtl: Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
      issn: 00039993
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1997 Aug
      vid: 78
      iid: 8
      pid: 1351
      pub: W B Saunders
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107240243
        107240243
        1998007610
        10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90201-x
        NLM9344307
        107240243
      ppf: 860
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Cumulative trauma disorders in the upper extremities: reliability of the Postural and Repetitive Risk-Factors Index.
      aug:
        au:
          James CPA
          Harburn KL
          Kramer JF
        affil: School of Occupational Therapy, Elborn College, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Cumulative Trauma Disorders Etiology
          Posture
          Computer Terminals
          Instrument Validation
          Repeated Measures
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Videorecording
          Analysis of Variance
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Confidence Intervals
          Validation Studies
          Research Instruments
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: OBJECTIVE: This study addresses test-retest reliability of the Postural and Repetitive Risk-Factors Index (PRRI) for work-related upper body injuries. This assessment was developed by the present authors. DESIGN: A repeated measures design was used to assess the test-retest reliability of a videotaped work-site assessment of subjects' movements. SUBJECTS: Ten heavy users of video display terminals (VDTs) from a local banking industry participated in the study. SETTING: The 10 subjects' movements were videotaped for 2 hours on each of 2 separate days, while working on-site at their VDTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The videotaped assessment, which utilized known postural risk factors for developing musculoskeletal disorder, pain, and discomfort in heavy VDT users (ie, repetitiveness, awkward and static postures, and contraction time), was called the PRRI. The videotaped movement assessments were subsequently analyzed in 15-minute sessions (five sessions per 2-hour videotape, which produced a total of 10 sessions over the 2 testing days), and each session was chosen randomly from the videotape. The subjects' movements were given a postural risk score according to the criteria in the PRRI. Each subject was therefore tested a total of 10 times (ie, 10 sessions), over two days. The maximum PRRI score for both sides of the body was 216 points. RESULTS: Reliability coefficients (RCs) for the PRRI scores were calculated, and the reliability of any one session met the minimum criterion for excellent reliability, which was .75. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference between sessions (p < .05). Calculations using the standard error of measurement (SEM) indicated that an individual tested once, on one day and with a PRRI score of 25, required a change of at least 8 points in order to be confident that a true change in score had occurred. The significant results from the reliability tests indicated that the PRRI was a reliable measurement tool that could be used by occupational health practitioners on the job site. Copyright (c) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N