Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: an empirical investigation.

Students referred by general education teachers to school study teams (SSTs) were evaluated for learning disabilities (LD) eligibility. We classified children as LD on the basis of a WISC-III Full Scale IQ of 82 or higher and a 22-point discrepancy between IQ and any WRAT-R achievement score. Resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 314 - 327
Autores principales: MacMillan DL, Gresham FM, Bocian KM
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Jul/Aug1998
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107299593&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107299593
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00222194
        LED
      jtl: Journal of Learning Disabilities
      issn: 00222194
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul/Aug1998
      vid: 31
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107299593
        107299593
        1998076065
        10.1177/002221949803100401
        NLM9666608
        107299593
      ppf: 314
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: an empirical investigation.
      aug:
        au:
          MacMillan DL
          Gresham FM
          Bocian KM
        affil: School of Education-82, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0128
      sug:
        subj:
          Learning Disorders Diagnosis
          Student Placement California
          Teachers
          Funding Source
          California
          Scales
          Students, Elementary
          Intellectual Disability
          Academic Performance
          Analysis of Variance
          Multivariate Analysis of Variance
          Confidence Intervals
          Chi Square Test
          Social Behavior
          Child
          Male
          Female
          Human
          Child: 6-12 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Students referred by general education teachers to school study teams (SSTs) were evaluated for learning disabilities (LD) eligibility. We classified children as LD on the basis of a WISC-III Full Scale IQ of 82 or higher and a 22-point discrepancy between IQ and any WRAT-R achievement score. Research decisions were then contrasted with actual school-based decisions regarding the child as LD. Over half of the students referred to SSTs were certified by the schools as LD, yet less than half of these school-certified students with LD evidenced the aptitude-achievement discrepancy required by the state. Examination of the cases called LD by the schools revealed that children were classified as LD on the basis of low absolute achievement, regardless of whether or not a discrepancy existed. Moreover, in cases where a discrepancy was found but the school did not classify the child as LD, that child evidenced significantly higher achievement, despite exhibiting the requisite 22-point discrepancy. The school-identified students with LD constituted an extremely heterogeneous group, including students with mental retardation along with a substantial number who failed to qualify for any special education services. Findings are discussed in terms of the discrepancy between criteria specified in state regulations and what the committee members at the school site seemed to use in classifying children with LD.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N