Evaluation of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine model.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of anatomical assumptions made to derive a geometrical, ideal, normal model of the upright, static, sagittal cervical spine, to make comparisons with other spinal models and to discuss the implications of a normal cervical model. BACKGROUND: Anatomical assumption...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 246 - 257
Autores principales: Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ
Formato: glossary pictorial tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. May97
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107335169&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107335169
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01614754
        8GE
      jtl: Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      issn: 01614754
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May97
      vid: 20
      iid: 4
      pid: 1265
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107335169
        107335169
        1997032476
        NLM9168409
        107335169
      ppf: 246
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine model.
      aug:
        au:
          Harrison DD
          Janik TJ
          Troyanovich SJ
          Harrison DE
          Colloca CJ
      sug:
        subj:
          Spine Anatomy and Histology
          Biomechanics
          Spine Analysis
          Models, Structural
          Funding Source
      ab: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of anatomical assumptions made to derive a geometrical, ideal, normal model of the upright, static, sagittal cervical spine, to make comparisons with other spinal models and to discuss the implications of a normal cervical model. BACKGROUND: Anatomical assumptions were made based on observations to assist in the development of a computerized geometrical model of the ideal upright, static, sagittal cervical spine. These assumptions address the magnitudes of the contribution made by the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs to the overall magnitude and geometric shape of the cervical lordosis. STUDY DESIGN: (a) Data were collected from 400 lordotic lateral cervical radiographs and compared with the predictions of a geometric normal cervical lordotic model. Angels of intersecting tangent lines, drawn at posterior vertebral body margins, were measured at each disc space and between C2 and C7. Height-to-length ratios and an anterior weight-bearing distance were measured. (b) Literature reviews were obtained through Medline and Chirolars. RESULTS: (a) Modeling: the 400 sample subjects varied from the geometric model by approximately 5%. Subgroup averages, from partitioning the C2-C7 angle into 5 degrees intervals, were less than 8% in error to model predictions. (b) Literature review: lordosis is the normal configuration for the cervical spine and many chiropractic empirical models are similar. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical assumptions used to derive our normal geometric model of the cervical lordosis seem to be supported by the average values and literature reviewed. Two typical geometric configurations of the cervical spine were identified as a normal circular lordotic arc of 34 degrees and an ideal normal of 42 degrees. Literature reviewed establishes cervical lordosis as a desirable clinical outcome of care.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        glossary
        pictorial
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N