Accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis.

Background: It has been suggested that GastroPanel might be a useful tool for the diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) measuring four biomarkers in blood: basal gastrin-17 (G17), pepsinogen I and II (PGI and PGII), and Helicobacter pylori antibodies.Aim: To determine the accuracy of GastroP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Vol. 26; no. 9; pp. 941 - 949
Autores principales: McNicholl, Adrian G, Forné, Montserrat, Barrio, Jesus, De la Coba, Cristobal, González, Begoña, Rivera, Robin, Esteve, Maria, Fernandez-Bañares, Fernando, Madrigal, Beatriz, Gras-Miralles, Beatriz, Perez-Aisa, Angeles, Viver-Pi-Sunyer, Jose M, Bory, Felipe, Rosinach, Merce, Loras, Carmen, Esteban, Carlos, Santolaria, Santos, Gomollon, Fernando, Valle, Julio, Gisbert, Javier P
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014 Sep
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107797950&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107797950
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0954691X
        8CE
      jtl: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
      issn: 0954691X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014 Sep
      vid: 26
      iid: 9
      pid: 5086
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107797950
        107797950
        NLM25014624
        2012666405
        10.1097/MEG.0000000000000132
        NLM25014624
        PMC4232299
        107797950
      ppf: 941
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis.
      aug:
        au:
          McNicholl, Adrian G
          Forné, Montserrat
          Barrio, Jesus
          De la Coba, Cristobal
          González, Begoña
          Rivera, Robin
          Esteve, Maria
          Fernandez-Bañares, Fernando
          Madrigal, Beatriz
          Gras-Miralles, Beatriz
          Perez-Aisa, Angeles
          Viver-Pi-Sunyer, Jose M
          Bory, Felipe
          Rosinach, Merce
          Loras, Carmen
          Esteban, Carlos
          Santolaria, Santos
          Gomollon, Fernando
          Valle, Julio
          Gisbert, Javier P
      sug:
        subj:
          Biological Markers Blood
          Gastritis, Atrophic Diagnosis
          Adult
          Algorithms
          Antibodies, Bacterial Blood
          Biopsy
          Chronic Disease
          Double-Blind Studies
          Female
          Gastritis, Atrophic Microbiology
          Helicobacter Infections Complications
          Helicobacter Pylori Immunology
          Human
          Male
          Middle Age
          Enzymes Blood
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Prospective Studies
          Pyloric Antrum Pathology
          Stomach Pathology
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: It has been suggested that GastroPanel might be a useful tool for the diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) measuring four biomarkers in blood: basal gastrin-17 (G17), pepsinogen I and II (PGI and PGII), and Helicobacter pylori antibodies.Aim: To determine the accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of CAG.Methods: This was a prospective, blinded, multicenter study that included dyspeptic patients. G17, PGI, and PGII were determined by enzyme immunoassays. Three antrum and two corpus biopsies were obtained for standard histological analysis and rapid urease test. Biopsies were analyzed by a single blinded expert pathologist.Results: Ninety-one patients were included (77% women, mean age 44 years, 51% H. pylori positive, 17% with CAG). G17 was reduced in patients with antrum CAG (5.4 vs. 13.4 pmol/l; P<0.01) and increased in patients with corpus CAG (11 vs. 24 pmol/l; P<0.05), but its accuracy was only acceptable in the case of corpus localization [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 74%]; PGII difference was almost statistically significant only when testing for corpus atrophy (33 vs. 21 μg/l; P=0.05; AUC=72%). The PGI and PGI/PGII ratio showed no significant differences (AUCs were all unacceptably low). Helicobacter pylori antibody levels were higher in H. pylori-infected patients (251 vs. 109 EIU, P=0.01; AUC=70). The accuracy of GastroPanel for the diagnosis of CAG was as follows: sensitivity 50%; specificity 80%; positive 25% and negative 92% predictive values; and positive 2.4 and negative 0.6 likelihood ratios.Conclusion: GastroPanel is not accurate enough for the diagnosis of CAG; thus, its systematic use in clinical practice cannot be recommended.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N