Prognostic factors associated with low back pain outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: An improved understanding of prognostic factors associated with low back pain (LBP) outcomes will refine expectations for patients, clinicians and funders alike and improve allocation of health resources to treat the condition. AIM: To establish the link between a range of clinical and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Primary Health Care Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 23 - 31
Autores principales: Gregg, Chris D., McIntosh, Greg, Hall, Hamilton, Hoffman, Chris W.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: CSIRO Publishing Mar2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107893126&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107893126
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        11726164
        92I9
      jtl: Journal of Primary Health Care
      issn: 11726164
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2014
      vid: 6
      iid: 1
      pid: 1568
      pub: CSIRO Publishing
      place: Canberra ACT, <Blank>
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107893126
        94894484
        10.1071/hc14023
        NLM24624408
        107893126
      ppf: 23
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Prognostic factors associated with low back pain outcomes.
      aug:
        au:
          Gregg, Chris D.
          McIntosh, Greg
          Hall, Hamilton
          Hoffman, Chris W.
        affil: Back Institute, New Zealand
      sug:
        subj:
          Low Back Pain Prognosis
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Patient Assessment Evaluation
          Human
          Retrospective Design
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Multiple Logistic Regression
          Record Review
          Odds Ratio
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Male
          Female
          Low Back Pain Therapy
          Employment Status
          Questionnaires
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          P-Value
          ROC Curve
          Aged
          Functional Status
          Job Re-Entry Evaluation
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: INTRODUCTION: An improved understanding of prognostic factors associated with low back pain (LBP) outcomes will refine expectations for patients, clinicians and funders alike and improve allocation of health resources to treat the condition. AIM: To establish the link between a range of clinical and sociodemographic prognostic variables for LBP against three separate, clinically relevant outcome measures. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-experimental study of 1076 consecutive LBP cases treated during a three-year period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between potential prognostic variables and outcome measures: clinically relevant reduction in pain, improvement in perceived function, and successful return to work six months after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Patients with clinically relevant improvements in LBP were more likely to have a shorter duration of pain (odds ratio [OR] 1.89), lower baseline pain (OR 1.19), a directional preference for extension activities (OR 1.45) and a history of spine surgery (OR 1.38). Clinically relevant gains in perceived function were observed in patients who were younger (OR 0.98) or those with shorter symptom duration (OR 1.74). Prognostic variables associated with a successful return to work included being female (OR 1.79), having a job available (OR 2.36), intermittent pain (OR 1.48) or a directional preference for extension activities (OR 1.78). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that there are a variety of prognostic variables to consider when determining outcome for an individual with LBP. The relative importance of each variable may differ depending on the outcome measured.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N