Healthcare professionals' self-reported experiences and preferences related to direct healthcare professional communications: a survey conducted in the Netherlands.

Background: In Europe, Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) are important tools to inform healthcare professionals of serious, new drug safety issues. However, this tool has not always been successful in effectively communicating the desired actions to healthcare professionals.Objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Drug Safety Vol. 35; no. 11; pp. 1061 - 1073
Autores principales: Piening S, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, de Graeff PA, Straus SM, Mol PG, Piening, Sigrid, Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M, de Graeff, Pieter A, Straus, Sabine M J M, Mol, Peter G M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature 2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=108072321&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 108072321
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01145916
        C5E
      jtl: Drug Safety
      issn: 01145916
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2012
      vid: 35
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108072321
        108072321
        NLM23061782
        2011712380
        10.1007/bf03261992
        NLM23061782
        108072321
      ppf: 1061
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Healthcare professionals' self-reported experiences and preferences related to direct healthcare professional communications: a survey conducted in the Netherlands.
      aug:
        au:
          Piening S
          Haaijer-Ruskamp FM
          de Graeff PA
          Straus SM
          Mol PG
          Piening, Sigrid
          Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M
          de Graeff, Pieter A
          Straus, Sabine M J M
          Mol, Peter G M
        affil: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Adverse Drug Event
          Communication
          Drugs, Prescription Adverse Effects
          Health Personnel Psychosocial Factors
          Pharmacovigilance
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Female
          Human
          Male
          Netherlands
          Self Report
          Statistics
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: In Europe, Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) are important tools to inform healthcare professionals of serious, new drug safety issues. However, this tool has not always been successful in effectively communicating the desired actions to healthcare professionals.Objective: The aim of this study was to explore healthcare providers' experiences and their preferences for improvement of risk communication, comparing views of general practitioners (GPs), internists, community pharmacists and hospital pharmacists.Methods: A questionnaire was developed and pilot tested to assess experiences and preferences of Dutch healthcare professionals with DHPCs. The questionnaire and two reminders were sent to a random sample of 3488 GPs, internists and community and hospital pharmacists in the Netherlands. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic characteristics of the respondents. Chi squares, ANOVAs and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used, when appropriate, to compare healthcare professional groups.Results: The overall response rate was 34% (N = 1141, ranging from 24% for internists to 46% for community pharmacists). Healthcare providers trusted safety information more when provided by the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) than by the pharmaceutical industry. This was more the case for GPs than for the other healthcare professionals. Respondents preferred safety information to be issued by the MEB, the Dutch Pharmacovigilance Center or their own professional associations. The preferred alternative channels of drug safety information were e-mail, medical journals and electronic prescribing systems.Conclusions: Safety information of drugs does not always reach healthcare professionals through DHPCs. To improve current risk communication of drug safety issues, alternative and/or additional methods of risk communication should be developed using electronic methods and medical journals. Moreover, (additional) risk communication coming from an independent source such as the MEB should be considered. Special effort is needed to reach GPs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N