Using functional neuroimaging combined with a think-aloud protocol to explore clinical reasoning expertise in internal medicine.

Background: Clinical reasoning is essential to medical practice, but because it entails internal mental processes, it is difficult to assess. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and think-aloud protocols may improve understanding of clinical reasoning as these methods can more directly asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Military Medicine pp. 72 - 79
Autores principales: Durning SJ, Graner J, Artino AR Jr, Pangaro LN, Beckman T, Holmboe E, Oakes T, Roy M, Riedy G, Capaldi V, Walter R, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, Durning, Steven J, Graner, John, Artino, Anthony R Jr, Pangaro, Louis N, Beckman, Thomas, Holmboe, Eric, Oakes, Terrance
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Sep2012 Supplement
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=108101052&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 108101052
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00264075
        4DV
      jtl: Military Medicine
      issn: 00264075
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2012 Supplement
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108101052
        108101052
        NLM23029866
        2011704664
        10.7205/milmed-d-12-00242
        NLM23029866
        108101052
      ppf: 72
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Using functional neuroimaging combined with a think-aloud protocol to explore clinical reasoning expertise in internal medicine.
      aug:
        au:
          Durning SJ
          Graner J
          Artino AR Jr
          Pangaro LN
          Beckman T
          Holmboe E
          Oakes T
          Roy M
          Riedy G
          Capaldi V
          Walter R
          van der Vleuten C
          Schuwirth L
          Durning, Steven J
          Graner, John
          Artino, Anthony R Jr
          Pangaro, Louis N
          Beckman, Thomas
          Holmboe, Eric
          Oakes, Terrance
        affil: Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Competence Standards
          Decision Making
          Diagnosis, Neurologic Methods
          Internal Medicine Standards
          Thinking
          Adult
          Basal Ganglia Physiology
          Female
          Human
          Male
          Middle Age
          Physicians Psychosocial Factors
          Frontal Lobe Physiology
          Temporal Lobe Physiology
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: Clinical reasoning is essential to medical practice, but because it entails internal mental processes, it is difficult to assess. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and think-aloud protocols may improve understanding of clinical reasoning as these methods can more directly assess these processes. The objective of our study was to use a combination of fMRI and think-aloud procedures to examine fMRI correlates of a leading theoretical model in clinical reasoning based on experimental findings to date: analytic (i.e., actively comparing and contrasting diagnostic entities) and nonanalytic (i.e., pattern recognition) reasoning. We hypothesized that there would be functional neuroimaging differences between analytic and nonanalytic reasoning theory.Methods: 17 board-certified experts in internal medicine answered and reflected on validated U.S. Medical Licensing Exam and American Board of Internal Medicine multiple-choice questions (easy and difficult) during an fMRI scan. This procedure was followed by completion of a formal think-aloud procedure.Results: fMRI findings provide some support for the presence of analytic and nonanalytic reasoning systems. Statistically significant activation of prefrontal cortex distinguished answering incorrectly versus correctly (p < 0.01), whereas activation of precuneus and midtemporal gyrus distinguished not guessing from guessing (p < 0.01).Conclusions: We found limited fMRI evidence to support analytic and nonanalytic reasoning theory, as our results indicate functional differences with correct vs. incorrect answers and guessing vs. not guessing. However, our findings did not suggest one consistent fMRI activation pattern of internal medicine expertise. This model of employing fMRI correlates offers opportunities to enhance our understanding of theory, as well as improve our teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning, a key outcome of medical education.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N