The need for reform of human subjects protections in military health research.
A number of factors currently hinder the ability of researchers to conduct military-funded research studies successfully in a timely fashion, including low-risk, psychosocial and behavioral, multisite studies. Our experiences and a review of the literature highlight examples of delays and wide varia...
| Publicado en: | Military Medicine Vol. 177; no. 2; pp. 204 - 209 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Feb2012
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=108164127&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 108164127 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00264075 4DV jtl: Military Medicine issn: 00264075 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2012 vid: 177 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 108164127 108164127 NLM22360068 2011474922 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00281 NLM22360068 108164127 ppf: 204 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The need for reform of human subjects protections in military health research. aug: au: Williams RA Gatien G Hagerty BM Williams, Reg Arthur Gatien, Gary Hagerty, Bonnie M affil: School of Nursing and Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA sug: subj: Institutional Review Research, Medical Ethical Issues Military Personnel Research Subjects Behavioral Research Medical Practice, Evidence-Based Health Care Reform Human Military Medicine Research ab: A number of factors currently hinder the ability of researchers to conduct military-funded research studies successfully in a timely fashion, including low-risk, psychosocial and behavioral, multisite studies. Our experiences and a review of the literature highlight examples of delays and wide variations in military and civilian Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals. This article describes the specific experiences from a program of research over a 15-year period, required documents unrelated to protection of human subjects, onsite study principal investigators, examples from other research, and participant recruitment. Concern is raised about significant resources committed to nonstudy interventions, some described as "training," which fall outside of IRB review and its human subject protections. A broad initiative for evidenced-based research, particularly psychosocial and behavioral research, could become marginalized with limited resources redirected to technology-focused quick fixes and data collection during training. Possible solutions and initiatives are proposed that emphasize the need to reform IRB oversight and associated paperwork that is required to undertake military research. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|