Differentiation of focal liver lesions: usefulness of parametric imaging with contrast-enhanced US.

Purpose: To evaluate whether parametric imaging with contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) is superior to visual assessment for the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs). Materials and Methods: This study had institutional review board approval, and verbal patient informed c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Radiology Vol. 261; no. 1; pp. 300 - 311
Autores principales: Anaye A, Perrenoud G, Rognin N, Arditi M, Mercier L, Frinking P, Ruffieux C, Peetrons P, Meuli R, Meuwly JY, Anaye, Anass, Perrenoud, Geneviève, Rognin, Nicolas, Arditi, Marcel, Mercier, Laurent, Frinking, Peter, Ruffieux, Christiane, Peetrons, Philippe, Meuli, Reto, Meuwly, Jean-Yves
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2011 Oct
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=108259553&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 108259553
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00338419
        0IQ
      jtl: Radiology
      issn: 00338419
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2011 Oct
      vid: 261
      iid: 1
      pid: 79357
      pub: Wolters Kluwer Health
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108259553
        108259553
        NLM21746815
        2011281556
        10.1148/radiol.11101866
        NLM21746815
        108259553
      ppf: 300
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Differentiation of focal liver lesions: usefulness of parametric imaging with contrast-enhanced US.
      aug:
        au:
          Anaye A
          Perrenoud G
          Rognin N
          Arditi M
          Mercier L
          Frinking P
          Ruffieux C
          Peetrons P
          Meuli R
          Meuwly JY
          Anaye, Anass
          Perrenoud, Geneviève
          Rognin, Nicolas
          Arditi, Marcel
          Mercier, Laurent
          Frinking, Peter
          Ruffieux, Christiane
          Peetrons, Philippe
          Meuli, Reto
          Meuwly, Jean-Yves
        affil: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Liver Neoplasms Ultrasonography
          Adult
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Contrast Media
          Diagnosis, Differential
          Female
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted
          Male
          Middle Age
          Prospective Studies
          Young Adult
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Purpose: To evaluate whether parametric imaging with contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) is superior to visual assessment for the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs). Materials and Methods: This study had institutional review board approval, and verbal patient informed consent was obtained. Between August 2005 and October 2008, 146 FLLs in 145 patients (63 women, 82 men; mean age, 62.5 years; age range, 22-89 years) were imaged with real-time low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced US after a bolus injection of 2.4 mL of a second-generation contrast agent. Clips showing contrast agent uptake kinetics (including arterial, portal, and late phases) were recorded and subsequently analyzed off-line with dedicated image processing software. Analysis of the dynamic vascular patterns (DVPs) of lesions with respect to adjacent parenchyma allowed mapping DVP signatures on a single parametric image. Cine loops of contrast-enhanced US and results from parametric imaging of DVP were assessed separately by three independent off-site readers who classified each lesion as benign, malignant, or indeterminate. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both techniques. Interobserver agreement (κ statistics) was determined. Results: Sensitivities for visual interpretation of cine loops for the three readers were 85.0%, 77.9%, and 87.6%, which improved significantly to 96.5%, 97.3%, and 96.5% for parametric imaging, respectively (P < .05, McNemar test), while retaining high specificity (90.9% for all three readers). Accuracy scores of parametric imaging were higher than those of conventional contrast-enhanced US for all three readers (P < .001, McNemar test). Interobserver agreement increased with DVP parametric imaging compared with conventional contrast-enhanced US (change of κ from 0.54 to 0.99). Conclusion: Parametric imaging of DVP improves diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US in the differentiation between malignant and benign FLLs; it also provides excellent interobserver agreement.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N