Revisiting Karl Barth's doctrine of baptism from a perspective on prayer.

This article focuses on Karl Barth's mature doctrine of baptism, as it is developed in the final part-volume of the Church Dogmatics. Published in 1967 (English translation in 1969) as a fragment of the ethics of the doctrine of reconciliation, Barth's theology of baptism is not without its controve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Scottish Journal of Theology Vol. 68; no. 3; pp. 255 - 273
Autor principal: Cocksworth, Ashley
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Aug2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=108335637&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 108335637
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00369306
        SJT
      jtl: Scottish Journal of Theology
      issn: 00369306
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2015
      vid: 68
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108335637
        10.1017/S0036930615000101
      ppf: 255
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Revisiting Karl Barth's doctrine of baptism from a perspective on prayer.
      aug:
        au: Cocksworth, Ashley
        affil: The Queen's Foundation, Somerset Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2QH, UK a.cocksworth@queens.ac.uk
      su:
        Baptism
        Barth, Karl, 1886-1968
        Church Dogmatics (Book)
        Reconciliation in religion
        Prayers
      sug:
        subj:
          Baptism
          Barth, Karl, 1886-1968
          Church Dogmatics (Book)
          Reconciliation in religion
          Prayers
      keyword:
        Agency
        baptism
        correspondence
        invocation
        Karl Barth
        prayer
      ab: This article focuses on Karl Barth's mature doctrine of baptism, as it is developed in the final part-volume of the Church Dogmatics. Published in 1967 (English translation in 1969) as a fragment of the ethics of the doctrine of reconciliation, Barth's theology of baptism is not without its controversy. Among the critiques that the baptism fragment has generated, one of the most significant concerns is over its presentation of the relation between divine agency and human agency. The formal division in the baptism fragment (and its sharp distinction between ‘Spirit baptism’ and ‘water baptism’) is taken to imply an uncharacteristic separation of divine agency and human agency, which renders his doctrine of baptism inconsistent with other areas of his thought. The argument proposed in this article, however, is that better clarity as to what Barth is theologically up to in the baptism fragment can be gained by reading his mature theology of baptism in connection with his theology of prayer. Barth's theology of prayer is rich and extensive. Although very present across all of his writings, his thinking on prayer (and indeed the Church Dogmatics itself) culminates in an intriguing set of meditations on the petitions of the Lord's Prayer. Although unfinished, these lectures on prayer were published posthumously as The Christian Life in 1976 (English translation 1981). Together with his doctrine of baptism and his unwritten doctrine of the Lord's Supper, the finished lectures on prayer would have formed the ethics of reconciliation. Importantly, Barth insists that baptism and the Lord's Supper were to be understood not only in the context of prayer but actually as prayer, as ‘invocation’. Rooted in the motif of ‘correspondence’, which is deployed at a number of key points throughout the Church Dogmatics, Barth's theology of invocation is based on a highly participative account of the divine–human relation: divine agency and human agency ‘correspond’ in the crucible of prayer. From the perspective provided by his writings on prayer, invocation and the motif of the ‘correspondence’ of divine and human agency, this article revisits the critique that Barth unduly separates divine and human agency in the baptism fragment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N