The Effects of Civil Hate Speech Laws: Lessons from Australia.

This article examines the effects of hate speech laws in Australia. Triangulating data from primary and secondary sources, we examine five hypothesized effects: whether the laws provide a remedy to targets of hate speech, encourage more respectful speech, have an educative or symbolic effect, have a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Society Review Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 631 - 665
Autores principales: Gelber, Katharine, McNamara, Luke
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Sep2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=108612206&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 108612206
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239216
        LSR
      jtl: Law & Society Review
      issn: 00239216
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2015
      vid: 49
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108612206
        10.1111/lasr.12152
      ppf: 631
      ppct: 34
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 191KB
      tig:
        atl: The Effects of Civil Hate Speech Laws: Lessons from Australia.
      aug:
        au:
          Gelber, Katharine
          McNamara, Luke
      su:
        Australia
        Hate speech
        Freedom of speech
        Criminal law
        Prejudices
        Public opinion
        Hate speech laws
      sug:
        subj:
          Hate speech
          Freedom of speech
          Criminal law
          Prejudices
          Public opinion
          Australia
          Hate speech laws
      ab: This article examines the effects of hate speech laws in Australia. Triangulating data from primary and secondary sources, we examine five hypothesized effects: whether the laws provide a remedy to targets of hate speech, encourage more respectful speech, have an educative or symbolic effect, have a chilling effect, or create 'martyrs.' We find the laws provide a limited remedy in the complaints mechanisms, provide a framework for direct community advocacy, and that knowledge of the laws exists in public discourse. However, the complaints mechanism imposes a significant enforcement burden on targeted communities, who still regularly experience hate speech. We find a reduction in the expression of prejudice in mediated outlets, but not on the street. We find no evidence of a chilling effect and we find the risk of free speech martyrs to be marginal. We draw out the implications of these findings for other countries.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N