THE COLONIALITY OF LANGUAGE: RACE, EXPRESSIVITY, POWER, AND THE DARKER SIDE OF MODERNITY.
This article presents a new framework to analyze linguistic relations of power that examines the linguistic effects of what Aníbal Quijano has theorized as "the coloniality of power." The argument is organized in two sections. The first section introduces "the coloniality of language," an expression...
| Publicado en: | Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women's & Gender Studies Vol. 13; pp. 108 - 135 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Research Foundation of SUNY on behalf of SUNY Cortland
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=108621393&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 108621393 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 21502226 86YU jtl: Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women's & Gender Studies issn: 21502226 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 13 pid: 49325 pub: Research Foundation of SUNY on behalf of SUNY Cortland artinfo: ui: 108621393 ppf: 108 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.1MB tig: atl: THE COLONIALITY OF LANGUAGE: RACE, EXPRESSIVITY, POWER, AND THE DARKER SIDE OF MODERNITY. aug: au: Veronelli, Gabriela A. affil: Binghamton University su: Quijano, Aníbal, 1928-2018 Communication Eurocentrism Language classification Colonial animals (Marine invertebrates) sug: subj: Communication Eurocentrism Language classification Colonial animals (Marine invertebrates) Quijano, Aníbal, 1928-2018 keyword: language modernity/coloniality monolanguaging race simple communication and simple communicator language modernity/coloniality monolanguaging race simple communication and simple communicator ab: This article presents a new framework to analyze linguistic relations of power that examines the linguistic effects of what Aníbal Quijano has theorized as "the coloniality of power." The argument is organized in two sections. The first section introduces "the coloniality of language," an expression the author uses to refer to the process of racialization of colonized populations as communicative agents beginning in the sixteenth century and continuing until today. This section includes an account of the language and communication paradigm being developed at the time of the Conquest, which, the author argues, contains the coloniality inside. In the second section, the author proposes to shift paradigms to get outside the "conceptual and social prison" of modernity/coloniality and understand colonized-colonialized languages and colonized-colonialized speakers differently. The conclusion illustrates some ideas and concerns about accessing and fostering decolonial alternatives that come forth from the article's critical analysis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|