Multiple Family Groups to reduce child disruptive behavior difficulties: Moderating effects of child welfare status on child outcomes.

Children who remain at home with their permanent caregivers following a child welfare (CW) involvement (e.g., investigation, out-of-home placement) manifest high rates of behavioral difficulties, which is a risk factor for further maltreatment and out-of-home placement if not treated effectively. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Child Abuse & Neglect Vol. 46; pp. 207 - 220
Autores principales: Gopalan, Geetha, Small, Latoya, Fuss, Ashley, Bowman, Melissa, Jackson, Jerrold, Marcus, Sue, Chacko, Anil
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Aug2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=108678365&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 108678365
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01452134
        CHC
      jtl: Child Abuse & Neglect
      issn: 01452134
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2015
      vid: 46
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        108678365
        10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.006
      ppf: 207
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Multiple Family Groups to reduce child disruptive behavior difficulties: Moderating effects of child welfare status on child outcomes.
      aug:
        au:
          Gopalan, Geetha
          Small, Latoya
          Fuss, Ashley
          Bowman, Melissa
          Jackson, Jerrold
          Marcus, Sue
          Chacko, Anil
        affil:
          School of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21230, USA
          Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY 10003, USA
          School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro St, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
          School of Social Work, University of Pennsylvania, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
          Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
          Division of Biostatistics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA
          Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, 246 Greene Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003, USA
      su:
        Child welfare
        Well-being
        Child abuse
        Behavior disorders
        Learning problems
      sug:
        subj:
          Child welfare
          Well-being
          Child abuse
          Behavior disorders
          Learning problems
      keyword:
        Evidence based treatment
        Mental health services
        Moderation analyses
        Multiple Family Groups
        Evidence based treatment
        Mental health services
        Moderation analyses
        Multiple Family Groups
      ab: Children who remain at home with their permanent caregivers following a child welfare (CW) involvement (e.g., investigation, out-of-home placement) manifest high rates of behavioral difficulties, which is a risk factor for further maltreatment and out-of-home placement if not treated effectively. A recently tested Multiple Family Group (MFG) service delivery model to treat youth Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving child behavior difficulties among hard-to-engage, socioeconomically disadvantaged families by addressing parenting skills, parent–child relationships, family communication and organization, social support, and stress. This exploratory study examines whether child behavioral outcomes for MFG differ for families with self-reported lifetime involvement in CW services compared to other families, as families with CW involvement struggle with additional stressors that can diminish treatment success. Youth (aged 7–11) and their families were assigned to MFG or services as usual (SAU) using a block comparison design. Caregivers reported on child behavior, social skills, and functional impairment. Mixed effects regression modeled multilevel outcomes across 4 assessment points (i.e., baseline, mid-test, post-test, 6-month follow-up). Among CW-involved families, MFG participants reported significantly reduced child oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at 6-month follow-up compared with SAU participants. No other differences were found in the effect of MFG treatment between CW and non-CW involved families. Findings suggest that MFG may be as effective in reducing child behavior difficulties for both CW and non-CW involved families. As a short-term, engaging, and efficient intervention, MFG may be a particularly salient service offering for families involved in the CW system.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N