الفصل النحوي بين مطالب التركيب وقيم الدلالة

This study aims at investigating the structured efforts of grammarians, to confirm the fact that Arabic language did not ignore syntax. It presents this in two major frames: First, the direct distinction which represents the relationship that maintains the significance, the second is the indirect or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 9 - 21
Autor principal: علي, عبد العزيز موسى
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Jordan 2006
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=108996417&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 108996417
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10263721
        S44
      jtl: Dirasat: Human & Social Sciences
      issn: 10263721
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2006
      vid: 33
      iid: 1
      pid: 19575
      pub: University of Jordan
    artinfo:
      ui: 108996417
      ppf: 9
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: الفصل النحوي بين مطالب التركيب وقيم الدلالة
      aug:
        au: علي, عبد العزيز موسى
        affil: كلية الأميرة عالية الجامعية، جامعة البلقاء التطبيقية
      sug:
      keyword:
        accepted disconnection
        concomittance
        semantics
        Structure
        transformation
        التحويل
        التركيب
        التلازم
        الدلالة
        الفصل المطرد
        accepted disconnection
        concomittance
        semantics
        Structure
        transformation
      ab: This study aims at investigating the structured efforts of grammarians, to confirm the fact that Arabic language did not ignore syntax. It presents this in two major frames: First, the direct distinction which represents the relationship that maintains the significance, the second is the indirect or extraordinary distinction, which represents the relationship that contains a hidden significance. Results of this study reveal that grammarians permitted this distinction in some cases and prevented it in other cases, based on rules of structured distinction and its relation to structured roots that allow this structured distinction to take place.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Arabic
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N