Religious Reasoning and Due Process of the Law: Why Religious Citizens Have the Burden to Prove the Innocence of Their Reasoning in the Public Square.
The article discusses the burden of proof upon religious citizens in the U.S. concerning actions based upon religious reasoning in the public square. The article discusses cases involving the concept known as Intelligent Design (ID), the so-called endorsement test concerning the constitutionality of...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Church & State Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 419 - 450 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Summer2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=109035470&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 109035470 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0021969X JCW jtl: Journal of Church & State issn: 0021969X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer2015 vid: 57 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 109035470 10.1093/jcs/csu005 ppf: 419 ppct: 31 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 654KB tig: atl: Religious Reasoning and Due Process of the Law: Why Religious Citizens Have the Burden to Prove the Innocence of Their Reasoning in the Public Square. aug: au: Holzer, Shannon affil: Professor of philosophy and religion, Houston Baptist University, Houston, Texas su: Faith & reason Due process of law Establishment clause (Constitutional law) Freedom of religion United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment Intelligent design (Teleology) United States. Supreme Court Lemon v. Kurtzman United States sug: subj: United States Faith & reason Due process of law Establishment clause (Constitutional law) Freedom of religion United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment Intelligent design (Teleology) United States. Supreme Court Lemon v. Kurtzman ab: The article discusses the burden of proof upon religious citizens in the U.S. concerning actions based upon religious reasoning in the public square. The article discusses cases involving the concept known as Intelligent Design (ID), the so-called endorsement test concerning the constitutionality of sponsored actions, and cases concerning same-sex marriage. It examines the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretations of the Establishment Clause in cases such as United States v. Seeger, Welsh v. United States, and Lemon v. Kurtzman. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 J.M. Dawson Institute of ChurchState Studies at Baylor University. item: Journal of Church & State holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|