Listening to the material life in discursive practices.
The purpose of this paper is to improve our understanding of how discursive practices are related to the sense of reality and materiality. It does not present ways of filling absences in storied fragmented and polyphonic lives, but rather offers a methodology of listening to what people say and do n...
| Publicado en: | Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 9 - 15 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=109081932&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 109081932 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15325555 G90A jtl: Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry issn: 15325555 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 vid: 12 iid: 2 pid: 15796 pub: TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science artinfo: ui: 109081932 ppf: 9 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 665KB tig: atl: Listening to the material life in discursive practices. aug: au: Reis, Cristina affil: University of New Haven and Reis Center LLC, United States su: Materialism Reality Discursive practices Storytelling Contextualism (Philosophy) sug: subj: Materialism Reality Discursive practices Storytelling Contextualism (Philosophy) keyword: Contextual structures Materiality Contextual structures Materiality ab: The purpose of this paper is to improve our understanding of how discursive practices are related to the sense of reality and materiality. It does not present ways of filling absences in storied fragmented and polyphonic lives, but rather offers a methodology of listening to what people say and do not say. It suggests the use of a multilayered theoretical framework only to listen to what is supposedly lived and experienced in discursive practices. The work produced by the researcher relies partly on what people do not say, and the researchers' interpretative criteria of discursive practices in the material realm involve challenging normality and hegemonic discourses. There are implications for organizational storytelling. The paper suggests that the reader can become aware of material contextual structures in storytelling by taking consideration of the influences of the sense of reality of material discursive practices in the theory of storytelling, as well as the perceived value and risks in its use. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|