On being a good Bayesian.

Bayesianism is fast becoming the dominant paradigm in archaeological chronology construction. This paradigm shift has been brought about in large part by widespread access to tailored computer software which provides users with powerful tools for complex statistical inference with little need to lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:World Archaeology Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 567 - 585
Autores principales: Buck, Caitlin E., Meson, Bo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=109226874&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 109226874
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00438243
        WAR
      jtl: World Archaeology
      issn: 00438243
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2015
      vid: 47
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109226874
        10.1080/00438243.2015.1053977
      ppf: 567
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: On being a good Bayesian.
      aug:
        au:
          Buck, Caitlin E.
          Meson, Bo
        affil:
          School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield
          Independent Scholar
      su:
        Historical chronology
        Bayesian analysis
        Radiocarbon dating
        Philosophy of science
        Computer programming
      sug:
        subj:
          Historical chronology
          Bayesian analysis
          Radiocarbon dating
          Philosophy of science
          Computer programming
      keyword:
        archaeological theory
        Bayesian inference
        ethics
        radiocarbon dating
        Scientific method
      ab: Bayesianism is fast becoming the dominant paradigm in archaeological chronology construction. This paradigm shift has been brought about in large part by widespread access to tailored computer software which provides users with powerful tools for complex statistical inference with little need to learn about statistical modelling or computer programming. As a result, we run the risk that such software will be reduced to the status of black boxes. This would be a dangerous position for our community since good, principled use of Bayesian methods requires mindfulness when selecting the initial model, defining prior information, checking the reliability and sensitivity of the software runs and interpreting the results obtained. In this article, we provide users with a brief review of the nature of the care required and offer some comments and suggestions to help ensure that our community continues to be respected for its philosophically rigorous scientific approach.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N