Choice, Rights, and Virtue: Prenatal Testing and Styles of Moral Reasoning in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Using a Foucauldian biopower analytic, this article combines insights from several ethnographic research projects around the moral reasoning styles underpinning debates over selective reproductive technologies in Aotearoa/New Zealand. We show that divergent or shared public, private, state, individu...
| Publicado en: | Medical Anthropology Quarterly Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 400 - 418 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=109307853&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 109307853 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 07455194 GFS jtl: Medical Anthropology Quarterly issn: 07455194 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2015 vid: 29 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 109307853 10.1111/maq.12217 ppf: 400 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 179KB tig: atl: Choice, Rights, and Virtue: Prenatal Testing and Styles of Moral Reasoning in Aotearoa/New Zealand. aug: au: Fitzgerald, Ruth P. Legge, Michael Park, Julie affil: Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago Anthropology, University of Auckland su: Bioethics Prenatal diagnosis Moral reasoning Reproductive technology research Biopolitics (Philosophy) sug: subj: Bioethics Prenatal diagnosis Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Moral reasoning Reproductive technology research Biopolitics (Philosophy) keyword: bio‐politics bio-politics choice genetic testing moral reasoning New Zealand bio‐politics bio-politics choice genetic testing moral reasoning New Zealand ab: Using a Foucauldian biopower analytic, this article combines insights from several ethnographic research projects around the moral reasoning styles underpinning debates over selective reproductive technologies in Aotearoa/New Zealand. We show that divergent or shared public, private, state, individual, and community moral reasoning styles become highly politicized truth discourses that have the potential to, and at times do, affect one another, modifying a dominant, state-supported, principal-based bioethics framework. The styles of moral reasoning that we identify pivot on an aspirational cultural ideal of the provision of choice to citizens, which is taken as an appropriate position from which to regulate selective reproductive technologies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|