Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Breast cancer screening is central to early breast cancer detection. Identifying and monitoring process measures for screening is a focus of the National Cancer Institute's Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) initiative, which requires participating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 567 - 576
Autores principales: Lacson, Ronilda, Harris, Kimberly, Brawarsky, Phyllis, Tosteson, Tor, Onega, Tracy, Tosteson, Anna, Kaye, Abby, Gonzalez, Irina, Birdwell, Robyn, Haas, Jennifer
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109465614&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109465614
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2015
      vid: 28
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109465614
        109465614
        109465614
        10.1007/s10278-014-9762-4
        NLM25561069
        PMC4570892
        109465614
      ppf: 567
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.
      aug:
        au:
          Lacson, Ronilda
          Harris, Kimberly
          Brawarsky, Phyllis
          Tosteson, Tor
          Onega, Tracy
          Tosteson, Anna
          Kaye, Abby
          Gonzalez, Irina
          Birdwell, Robyn
          Haas, Jennifer
        affil: Department of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Cancer Screening
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Natural Language Processing
          Information Retrieval
          National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
          Automation
          Reports
          Radiography
          Resource Databases
          Data Curation
          Vocabulary, Controlled
          Prevalence
          Evaluation Research
          Random Sample
          Validation Studies
          kappa Statistic
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Human
          Funding Source
      ab: Breast cancer screening is central to early breast cancer detection. Identifying and monitoring process measures for screening is a focus of the National Cancer Institute's Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) initiative, which requires participating centers to report structured data across the cancer screening continuum. We evaluate the accuracy of automated information extraction of imaging findings from radiology reports, which are available as unstructured text. We present prevalence estimates of imaging findings for breast imaging received by women who obtained care in a primary care network participating in PROSPR ( n = 139,953 radiology reports) and compared automatically extracted data elements to a 'gold standard' based on manual review for a validation sample of 941 randomly selected radiology reports, including mammograms, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prevalence of imaging findings vary by data element and modality (e.g., suspicious calcification noted in 2.6 % of screening mammograms, 12.1 % of diagnostic mammograms, and 9.4 % of tomosynthesis exams). In the validation sample, the accuracy of identifying imaging findings, including suspicious calcifications, masses, and architectural distortion (on mammogram and tomosynthesis); masses, cysts, non-mass enhancement, and enhancing foci (on MRI); and masses and cysts (on ultrasound), range from 0.8 to1.0 for recall, precision, and F-measure. Information extraction tools can be used for accurate documentation of imaging findings as structured data elements from text reports for a variety of breast imaging modalities. These data can be used to populate screening registries to help elucidate more effective breast cancer screening processes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N