Web-Based Assessment of Outcomes After Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A New Patient Centered Option for Outcomes Assessment.

Background: Clinical outcomes are typically assessed by trained staff. We tested the hypothesis that outcomes reported by the patient or a caregiver on the web would be correlated with a validated interview.Methods: We assessed surviving patients with intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Neurocritical Care Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 22 - 28
Autores principales: Naidech, Andrew M, Beaumont, Jennifer L, Berman, Michael, Liotta, Eric, Maas, Matthew B, Prabhakaran, Shyam, Kording, Konrad, Holl, Jane, Cella, David
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109608761&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109608761
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15416933
        1WYA
      jtl: Neurocritical Care
      issn: 15416933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2015
      vid: 23
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109608761
        NLM25510897
        2013111169
        10.1007/s12028-014-0098-1
        NLM25510897
        109608761
      ppf: 22
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Web-Based Assessment of Outcomes After Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A New Patient Centered Option for Outcomes Assessment.
      aug:
        au:
          Naidech, Andrew M
          Beaumont, Jennifer L
          Berman, Michael
          Liotta, Eric
          Maas, Matthew B
          Prabhakaran, Shyam
          Kording, Konrad
          Holl, Jane
          Cella, David
        affil: Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, 710 N Lake Shore Drive 11th floor, Chicago, 60611, USA, a-naidech@northwestern.edu.
      sug:
      ab: Background: Clinical outcomes are typically assessed by trained staff. We tested the hypothesis that outcomes reported by the patient or a caregiver on the web would be correlated with a validated interview.Methods: We assessed surviving patients with intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage at 1- , 3- , and 12-month follow-up with a validated interview for the modified Rankin Scale (mRS, a validated ordinal scale from 0, no symptoms to 5, severe disability). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed on the web with NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL using computer adaptive testing by the patient, proxy reporting by a caregiver, or proxy entry by study staff.Results: A coincident mRS and HRQoL assessment was available for 149 (71 %) of 209 patients at one, three, or 12 months. There were 89 assessments with proxy entry by study staff, 89 by the patient on the web, and 58 with proxy report by a caregiver on the web. PROMIS physical function assessments were completed in median of 4 questions, and T scores were associated with the mRS (P < 0.001), regardless of respondent. Mean T scores in every category of the mRS were different from every other category (P ≤ 0.003 for all). Results were similar for Neuro-QOL mobility.Conclusions: Web-based HRQoL assessment with NIH PROMIS and Neuro-QOL is feasible and correlated with a validated interview for the mRS. T scores distinguished between individual categories of the mRS, detecting modest differences in physical function and mobility HRQoL that are difficult to detect with the mRS. PROMIS and Neuro-QOL provide powerful and sensitive outcomes for potentially large cohorts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N