Urgent need to reevaluate the latest World Health Organization guidelines for toxic inorganic substances in drinking water.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidelines for drinking-water quality that cover biological and chemical hazards from both natural and anthropogenic sources. In the most recent edition of Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (2011), the WHO withdrew, suspended, did not establish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 63 - 64
Main Authors: Frisbie, Seth H, Mitchell, Erika J, Sarkar, Bibudhendra
Format: review Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central 2015
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109621389&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109621389
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1476069X
        1CNO
      jtl: Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
      issn: 1476069X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 14
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109621389
        109621389
        NLM26268322
        2013129648
        10.1186/s12940-015-0050-7
        NLM26268322
        PMC4535738
        109621389
      ppf: 63
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Urgent need to reevaluate the latest World Health Organization guidelines for toxic inorganic substances in drinking water.
      aug:
        au:
          Frisbie, Seth H
          Mitchell, Erika J
          Sarkar, Bibudhendra
      sug:
      ab: The World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidelines for drinking-water quality that cover biological and chemical hazards from both natural and anthropogenic sources. In the most recent edition of Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (2011), the WHO withdrew, suspended, did not establish, or raised guidelines for the inorganic toxic substances manganese, molybdenum, nitrite, aluminum, boron, nickel, uranium, mercury, and selenium. In this paper, we review these changes to the WHO drinking-water guidelines, examining in detail the material presented in the WHO background documents for each of these toxic substances. In some cases, these WHO background documents use literature reviews that do not take into account scientific research published within the last 10 or more years. In addition, there are instances in which standard WHO practices for deriving guidelines are not used; for example, rounding and other mathematical errors are made. According to published meeting reports from the WHO Chemical Aspects Working Group, the WHO has a timetable for revising some of its guidelines for drinking-water quality, but for many of these toxic substances the planned changes are minimal or will be delayed for as long as 5 years. Given the limited nature of the planned WHO revisions to the inorganic toxic substances and the extended timetable for these revisions, we suggest that governments, researchers, and other stakeholders might establish independent recommendations for inorganic toxic substances and possibly other chemicals to proactively protect public health, or at the very least, revert to previous editions of the Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, which were more protective of public health.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N