Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

Background: Health systems worldwide are facing shortages in health professional workforce. Several studies have demonstrated the direct correlation between the availability of health workers, coverage of health services, and population health outcomes. To address this shortage, online eLearning is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Global Health Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 010406 - 10407
Autores principales: George, Pradeep Paul, Papachristou, Nikos, Belisario, José Marcano, Wang, Wei, Wark, Petra A, Cotic, Ziva, Rasmussen, Kristine, Sluiter, René, Riboli-Sasco, Eva, Tudor Car, Lorainne, Musulanov, Eve Marie, Molina, Joseph Antonio, Heng, Bee Hoon, Zhang, Yanfeng, Wheeler, Erica Lynette, Al Shorbaji, Najeeb, Majeed, Azeem, Car, Josip
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society Jun2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109671187&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109671187
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20472978
        DBQG
      jtl: Journal of Global Health
      issn: 20472978
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2014
      vid: 4
      iid: 1
      pid: 72708
      pub: Edinburgh University Global Health Society
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109671187
        NLM24976965
        2012633652
        10.7189/jogh.04.010406
        NLM24976965
        PMC4073252
        109671187
      ppf: 010406
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.
      aug:
        au:
          George, Pradeep Paul
          Papachristou, Nikos
          Belisario, José Marcano
          Wang, Wei
          Wark, Petra A
          Cotic, Ziva
          Rasmussen, Kristine
          Sluiter, René
          Riboli-Sasco, Eva
          Tudor Car, Lorainne
          Musulanov, Eve Marie
          Molina, Joseph Antonio
          Heng, Bee Hoon
          Zhang, Yanfeng
          Wheeler, Erica Lynette
          Al Shorbaji, Najeeb
          Majeed, Azeem
          Car, Josip
      sug:
      ab: Background: Health systems worldwide are facing shortages in health professional workforce. Several studies have demonstrated the direct correlation between the availability of health workers, coverage of health services, and population health outcomes. To address this shortage, online eLearning is increasingly being adopted in health professionals' education. To inform policy-making, in online eLearning, we need to determine its effectiveness.Methods: We performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of online eLearning through a comprehensive search of the major databases for randomised controlled trials that compared online eLearning to traditional learning or alternative learning methods. The search period was from January 2000 to August 2013. We included articles which primarily focused on students' knowledge, skills, satisfaction and attitudes toward eLearning and cost-effectiveness and adverse effects as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Due to significant heterogeneity among the included studies, we presented our results as a narrative synthesis.Findings: Fifty-nine studies, including 6750 students enrolled in medicine, dentistry, nursing, physical therapy and pharmacy studies, met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of the 50 studies testing knowledge gains found significantly higher gains in the online eLearning intervention groups compared to traditional learning, whereas 27 did not detect significant differences or found mixed results. Eleven studies did not test for differences. Six studies detected significantly higher skill gains in the online eLearning intervention groups, whilst 3 other studies testing skill gains did not detect differences between groups and 1 study showed mixed results. Twelve studies tested students' attitudes, of which 8 studies showed no differences in attitudes or preferences for online eLearning. Students' satisfaction was measured in 29 studies, 4 studies showed higher satisfaction for online eLearning and 20 studies showed no difference in satisfaction between online eLearning and traditional learning. Risk of bias was high for several of the included studies.Conclusion: The current evidence base suggests that online eLearning is equivalent, possibly superior to traditional learning. These findings present a potential incentive for policy makers to cautiously encourage its adoption, while respecting the heterogeneity among the studies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N