High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.

The high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) algorithm was proposed for automation of confounding adjustment in problems involving large healthcare databases. It has been evaluated in comparative effectiveness research (CER) with point treatments to handle baseline confounding through matching or co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Statistics in Medicine Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 753 - 782
Autores principales: Neugebauer, Romain, Schmittdiel, Julie A, Zhu, Zheng, Rassen, Jeremy A, Seeger, John D, Schneeweiss, Sebastian
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109695024&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109695024
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02776715
        2DZ
      jtl: Statistics in Medicine
      issn: 02776715
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2014
      vid: 33
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109695024
        NLM25488047
        2012883576
        10.1002/sim.6377
        NLM25488047
        109695024
      ppf: 753
      ppct: 29
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
      aug:
        au:
          Neugebauer, Romain
          Schmittdiel, Julie A
          Zhu, Zheng
          Rassen, Jeremy A
          Seeger, John D
          Schneeweiss, Sebastian
      sug:
      ab: The high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) algorithm was proposed for automation of confounding adjustment in problems involving large healthcare databases. It has been evaluated in comparative effectiveness research (CER) with point treatments to handle baseline confounding through matching or covariance adjustment on the hdPS. In observational studies with time-varying interventions, such hdPS approaches are often inadequate to handle time-dependent confounding and selection bias. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimation to fit marginal structural models can adequately handle these biases under the fundamental assumption of no unmeasured confounders. Upholding of this assumption relies on the selection of an adequate set of covariates for bias adjustment. We describe the application and performance of the hdPS algorithm to improve covariate selection in CER with time-varying interventions based on IPW estimation and explore stabilization of the resulting estimates using Super Learning. The evaluation is based on both the analysis of electronic health records data in a real-world CER study of adults with type 2 diabetes and a simulation study. This report (i) establishes the feasibility of IPW estimation with the hdPS algorithm based on large electronic health records databases, (ii) demonstrates little impact on inferences when supplementing the set of expert-selected covariates using the hdPS algorithm in a setting with extensive background knowledge, (iii) supports the application of the hdPS algorithm in discovery settings with little background knowledge or limited data availability, and (iv) motivates the application of Super Learning to stabilize effect estimates based on the hdPS algorithm.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N