A comparison of three policy approaches for tobacco retailer reduction.

Background: The Institute of Medicine recommends that public health agencies restrict the number and regulate the location of tobacco retailers as a means of reducing tobacco use. However, the best policy strategy for tobacco retailer reduction is unknown.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Preventive Medicine Vol. 74; pp. 67 - 74
Autores principales: Myers, Allison E, Hall, Marissa G, Isgett, Lisa F, Ribisl, Kurt M
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. May2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109719028&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109719028
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00917435
        DP9
      jtl: Preventive Medicine
      issn: 00917435
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2015
      vid: 74
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
      place: Burlington, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109719028
        109719028
        NLM25689540
        2012963725
        10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.025
        NLM25689540
        PMC4563823
        109719028
      ppf: 67
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A comparison of three policy approaches for tobacco retailer reduction.
      aug:
        au:
          Myers, Allison E
          Hall, Marissa G
          Isgett, Lisa F
          Ribisl, Kurt M
      sug:
      ab: Background: The Institute of Medicine recommends that public health agencies restrict the number and regulate the location of tobacco retailers as a means of reducing tobacco use. However, the best policy strategy for tobacco retailer reduction is unknown.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to test the percent reduction in the number and density of tobacco retailers in North Carolina resulting from three policies: (1) prohibiting sales of tobacco products in pharmacies or stores with a pharmacy counter, (2) restricting sales of tobacco products within 1000 ft of schools, and (3) regulating to 500 ft the minimum allowable distance between tobacco outlets.Methods: This study uses data from two lists of tobacco retailers gathered in 2012, one at the statewide level, and another "gold standard" three-county list. Retailers near schools were identified using point and parcel boundaries in ArcMap. Python programming language generated a random lottery system to remove retailers within 500 ft of each other. Analyses were conducted in 2014.Results: A minimum allowable distance policy had the single greatest impact and would reduce density by 22.1% at the state level, or 20.8% at the county level (range 16.6% to 27.9%). Both a pharmacy and near-schools ban together would reduce density by 29.3% at the state level, or 29.7% at the county level (range 26.3 to 35.6%).Conclusions: The implementation of policies restricting tobacco sales in pharmacies, near schools, and/or in close proximity to another tobacco retailer would substantially reduce the number and density of tobacco retail outlets.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N