Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions.
Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has supported implementation science for over a decade. We explore the application of implementation science across the cancer control continuum, including prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship.Methods: We reviewed funding trends of implem...
| Publicado en: | Implementation Science Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 4 - 5 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | historical material Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109726206&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 109726206 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17485908 38MN jtl: Implementation Science issn: 17485908 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 10 iid: 1 pid: 24147 pub: BioMed Central artinfo: ui: 109726206 NLM25567702 2012984428 10.1186/s13012-014-0200-2 NLM25567702 PMC4296529 109726206 ppf: 4 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. aug: au: Neta, Gila Sanchez, Michael A Chambers, David A Phillips, Siobhan M Leyva, Bryan Cynkin, Laurie Farrell, Margaret M Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne Vinson, Cynthia sug: ab: Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has supported implementation science for over a decade. We explore the application of implementation science across the cancer control continuum, including prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship.Methods: We reviewed funding trends of implementation science grants funded by the NCI between 2000 and 2012. We assessed study characteristics including cancer topic, position on the T2-T4 translational continuum, intended use of frameworks, study design, settings, methods, and replication and cost considerations.Results: We identified 67 NCI grant awards having an implementation science focus. R01 was the most common mechanism, and the total number of all awards increased from four in 2003 to 15 in 2012. Prevention grants were most frequent (49.3%) and cancer treatment least common (4.5%). Diffusion of Innovations and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) were the most widely reported frameworks, but it is unclear how implementation science models informed planned study measures. Most grants (69%) included mixed methods, and half reported replication and cost considerations (49.3%).Conclusions: Implementation science in cancer research is active and diverse but could be enhanced by greater focus on measures development, assessment of how conceptual frameworks and their constructs lead to improved dissemination and implementation outcomes, and harmonization of measures that are valid, reliable, and practical across multiple settings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: historical material Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|