Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.

Background: Manual eligibility screening (ES) for a clinical trial typically requires a labor-intensive review of patient records that utilizes many resources. Leveraging state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) and information extraction (IE) technologies, we sought to improve the efficie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 28 - 29
Autores principales: Ni, Yizhao, Wright, Jordan, Perentesis, John, Lingren, Todd, Deleger, Louise, Kaiser, Megan, Kohane, Isaac, Solti, Imre
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109726801&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109726801
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14726947
        1CI0
      jtl: BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making
      issn: 14726947
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 15
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109726801
        109726801
        NLM25881112
        2012985332
        10.1186/s12911-015-0149-3
        NLM25881112
        PMC4407835
        109726801
      ppf: 28
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.
      aug:
        au:
          Ni, Yizhao
          Wright, Jordan
          Perentesis, John
          Lingren, Todd
          Deleger, Louise
          Kaiser, Megan
          Kohane, Isaac
          Solti, Imre
      sug:
      ab: Background: Manual eligibility screening (ES) for a clinical trial typically requires a labor-intensive review of patient records that utilizes many resources. Leveraging state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) and information extraction (IE) technologies, we sought to improve the efficiency of physician decision-making in clinical trial enrollment. In order to markedly reduce the pool of potential candidates for staff screening, we developed an automated ES algorithm to identify patients who meet core eligibility characteristics of an oncology clinical trial.Methods: We collected narrative eligibility criteria from ClinicalTrials.gov for 55 clinical trials actively enrolling oncology patients in our institution between 12/01/2009 and 10/31/2011. In parallel, our ES algorithm extracted clinical and demographic information from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) data fields to represent profiles of all 215 oncology patients admitted to cancer treatment during the same period. The automated ES algorithm then matched the trial criteria with the patient profiles to identify potential trial-patient matches. Matching performance was validated on a reference set of 169 historical trial-patient enrollment decisions, and workload, precision, recall, negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity were calculated.Results: Without automation, an oncologist would need to review 163 patients per trial on average to replicate the historical patient enrollment for each trial. This workload is reduced by 85% to 24 patients when using automated ES (precision/recall/NPV/specificity: 12.6%/100.0%/100.0%/89.9%). Without automation, an oncologist would need to review 42 trials per patient on average to replicate the patient-trial matches that occur in the retrospective data set. With automated ES this workload is reduced by 90% to four trials (precision/recall/NPV/specificity: 35.7%/100.0%/100.0%/95.5%).Conclusion: By leveraging NLP and IE technologies, automated ES could dramatically increase the trial screening efficiency of oncologists and enable participation of small practices, which are often left out from trial enrollment. The algorithm has the potential to significantly reduce the effort to execute clinical research at a point in time when new initiatives of the cancer care community intend to greatly expand both the access to trials and the number of available trials.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N