Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources?
This research investigated the behavioural consequences of homophobic epithets. After exposure to either a category or a homophobic label, heterosexual participants allocated fictitious resources to two different prevention programmes: one mainly relevant to heterosexuals (sterility prevention), the...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 383 - 394 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109797631&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 109797631 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01446665 99J jtl: British Journal of Social Psychology issn: 01446665 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2015 vid: 54 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 109797631 103168294 10.1111/bjso.12090 NLM25330919 109797631 ppf: 383 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources? aug: au: Fasoli, Fabio Maass, Anne Carnaghi, Andrea affil: University of Padua sug: subj: Resource Allocation Homophobia Psychosocial Factors Group Processes Infertility Prevention and Control HIV Infections Prevention and Control Homophobia Complications Human Male Female Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Confidence Intervals Odds Ratio Social Attitudes Scales Male Female ab: This research investigated the behavioural consequences of homophobic epithets. After exposure to either a category or a homophobic label, heterosexual participants allocated fictitious resources to two different prevention programmes: one mainly relevant to heterosexuals (sterility prevention), the other to homosexuals ( AIDS- HIV prevention). Responses on allocation matrices served to identify strategies that favoured the ingroup over the outgroup. Results indicated stronger ingroup-favouritism in the homophobic than in the category label condition. This study shows that discriminatory group labels have tangible effects on people's monetary behaviours in intergroup contexts, increasing their tendency to favour the ingroup when distributing resources. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|