Enhancing Stewardship of Community-Engaged Research Through Governance.
Objectives. We explored the relationship of community-engaged research final approval type (tribal government, health board, or public health office (TG/ HB); agency staff or advisory board; or individual or no community approval) with governance processes, productivity, and perceived outcomes. Meth...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Public Health Vol. 105; no. 6; pp. 1161 - 1168 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Public Health Association
Jun2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=109803707&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 109803707 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00900036 APH jtl: American Journal of Public Health issn: 00900036 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2015 vid: 105 iid: 6 pid: 44 pub: American Public Health Association artinfo: ui: 109803707 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302457 ppf: 1161 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Enhancing Stewardship of Community-Engaged Research Through Governance. aug: au: Oetzel, John G. Villegas, Malia Zenone, Heather Hat, Emily R. White Wallerstein, Nina Duran, Bonnie su: Social responsibility Community-based social services Confidence intervals Data analysis software Descriptive statistics Odds ratio sug: subj: Social responsibility Community-based social services Other Individual and Family Services Confidence intervals Data analysis software Descriptive statistics Odds ratio ab: Objectives. We explored the relationship of community-engaged research final approval type (tribal government, health board, or public health office (TG/ HB); agency staff or advisory board; or individual or no community approval) with governance processes, productivity, and perceived outcomes. Methods. We identified 294 federally funded community-engaged research projects in 2009 from the National Institutes of Health's Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Prevention Research Centers, and Native American Research Centers for Health databases. Two hundred (68.0%) investigators completed a survey about governance processes and productivity measures; 312 partners (77.2% of 404 invited) and 138 investigators (69.0% of 200 invited) completed a survey about perceived outcomes. Results. Projects with TG/HB approval had increased likelihood of community control of resources (odds ratios [ORs]>4.80). Projects with other approvals had decreased likelihood of development or revision of institutional review board policies (ORs<0.37), having written agreements (ORs<0.17), and agreements about publishing (ORs<0.28), data use (ORs<0.17), and publishing approval (ORs<0.14). Conclusions. Community-engaged research projects with TG/HB approval had strong stewardship of project resources and agreements. Governance as stewardship protects community interests; thus, is an ethical imperative for communities, especially native communities, to adopt. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|