New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: Effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Objectives Most cochlear implants implement stimulation strategies which apply sequential electrical pulses to encode acoustic signals such as speech, noise, and sounds via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Parallel stimulation of adjacent electrodes has been employed in recent cochlear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cochlear Implants International: An Interdisciplinary Journal Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 142 - 150
Autores principales: Bahmer, Andreas, Baumann, Uwe
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109865316&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109865316
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14670100
        VRZ
      jtl: Cochlear Implants International: An Interdisciplinary Journal
      issn: 14670100
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2013
      vid: 14
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109865316
        2012763911
        10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000011
        NLM22733121
        109865316
      ppf: 142
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: Effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
      aug:
        au:
          Bahmer, Andreas
          Baumann, Uwe
      sug:
        subj:
          Cochlear Implant
          Pitch Perception
          Acoustic Stimulation
          Adult
          Aged
          Rehabilitation of Persons with Hearing Loss
          Electric Stimulation
          Electrodes, Implanted
          Human
          Middle Age
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Objectives Most cochlear implants implement stimulation strategies which apply sequential electrical pulses to encode acoustic signals such as speech, noise, and sounds via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Parallel stimulation of adjacent electrodes has been employed in recent cochlear implant (CI) systems in an endeavor to improve coding of pitch information (e.g. FS4-p fine structure with parallel signal processing MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria; VCIS, AB Corp., Sylmar, CA, USA). We investigated whether parallel stimulation of three adjacent electrodes enhances rate pitch perception compared with single electrode stimulation. Methods Most comfortable loudness (MCLs) levels were assessed in single and multi electrode condition in 12 subjects (15 ears, PULSARci100/SONATAti100 implant, MED-EL). Rate pitch discrimination was determined by means of an adaptive procedure (two-interval two-alternative forced choice, 2I2AFC) at individual MCL in the single- and multi-electrode condition at base frequencies of 100, 200, 283, 400, and 566 pulses per second (pps) (single electrode condition: electrode 5, multi electrode condition: electrode 4, 5, 6; PULSARci100/SONATAti100 implant: 12 electrode contacts; 1, most apical; 12, most basal). Results To achieve MCL in the multi-electrode condition significantly higher stimulation current compared with single stimulation was required. No significant difference between single- and multi-electrode condition just noticeable differences in rate discrimination (JNDR) group was found. In contrast, a pairwise comparison of individual results in a subgroup recruited out of successfully completed runs at high base rates showed statistically an improved rate discrimination in 17 of 24 runs in the multi-electrode condition. Therefore, a potential effect of parallel stimulation on rate discrimination is conceivable. Discussion The results in a subgroup of this study indicate that, compared with single-electrode stimulation, synchronous multi-electrode stimulation of three adjacent electrodes shows improvement rate discrimination in 17 of 24 test runs (binomial and [chi](2) test, P = 0.05) but did not result in statistically better JNDRs (best averaged improvement 19.8% at base rate 400 pps).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N