Female nurses' perceptions regarding the severity of facial disfigurement in patients following surgery for head and neck cancer: a comparison based on experience in head and neck oncology.

This comparative descriptive study was conducted to determine differences in female nurses' perceptions regarding the severity of facial disfigurement in patients following surgery for head and neck cancer. Differences in perceptions based on patient gender were also explored. King's Theory of Goal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Female Nurses' Perceptions Regarding the Severity of Facial Disfigurement in Patients Following Surgery for Head & Neck Cancer: A Comparison Based on Experience in Head & Neck Oncology pp. 218 p - 219
Autor principal: Lockhart JS
Formato: research Doctoral Dissertation
Publicado: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1992
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109871438&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 109871438
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
      disstl: Female nurses' perceptions regarding the severity of facial disfigurement in patients following surgery for head and neck cancer: a comparison based on experience in head and neck oncology.
      dissinst: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    jinfo:
      jid: I7H6
      jtl: Female Nurses' Perceptions Regarding the Severity of Facial Disfigurement in Patients Following Surgery for Head & Neck Cancer: A Comparison Based on Experience in Head & Neck Oncology
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1992
      pub: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    artinfo:
      ui:
        109871438
        109871438
        1995019577
        UMI Order PUZ9317997
        109871438
      ppf: 218 p
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Female nurses' perceptions regarding the severity of facial disfigurement in patients following surgery for head and neck cancer: a comparison based on experience in head and neck oncology.
      aug:
        au: Lockhart JS
      sug:
        subj:
          Nurse Attitudes
          Cancer Patients
          Disfigurement
          Face
          Head and Neck Neoplasms
          Nurse-Patient Relations
          Descriptive Research
          Comparative Studies
          King Open Systems Model
          Sex Factors
          Convenience Sample
          Job Experience
          Interviews
          Attitude Measures
          Pilot Studies
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Coefficient alpha
          Content Validity
          Descriptive Statistics
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Human
      ab: This comparative descriptive study was conducted to determine differences in female nurses' perceptions regarding the severity of facial disfigurement in patients following surgery for head and neck cancer. Differences in perceptions based on patient gender were also explored. King's Theory of Goal Attainment (1971, 1981) served as the theoretical framework used to investigate the concept of perception in nurse-patient interactions. Subjects comprised a nonprobability sampling design of a convenience type that included two groups of female nurses, 30 experienced and 30 inexperienced in head and neck oncology. Using a face-to-face interview approach, subjects were asked to complete a Demographic Data Form (DDF) and the Modified Disfigurement Scale (MDS), an instrument adapted from the Disfigurement/Dysfunction Scale (Dropkin et al., 1983). A pilot study determined content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient =.92), and test-retest reliability (.76 after two weeks). Data analysis included both descriptive and inferential statistics. Frequency distributions and measures of central tendency and variability were used to create demographic profiles and to compute the four components of the MDS: Total Photo Response (TPR), Male Photo Response (MPR), Female Photo Response (FPR), and Individual Photo Response (IPR). Pearson product-moment correlations were used to determine associations among IPR scores. A two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor served as the experimental design used to answer the research questions. Findings indicated that although experienced nurses evaluated the photos on the MDS as being less disfigured than the inexperienced nurses, this difference was not statistically significant (F = 1.26, p =.266). Second, significant differences were found in nurses' perceptions of facial disfigurement based on the factor of patient gender when all 60 nurses evaluated the photos (F = 41.61, p =.000). However, while all 60 nurses evaluated female photos as being more disfigured than male photos, this difference in perceptions was not an effect of their experience (F = 3.29, p =.075). Additional analyses of IPR scores suggested that all 60 nurses evaluated photos that depicted surgical procedures involving the central portion of the face as being more disfigured than photos involving the periphery of the face with less tissue removal. Results were interpreted with particular implications for nurse educators in both staff development and schools of nursing. Educators need to consider the effect of gender-specific perceptions in designing teaching strategies for nurses who care for facially disfigured patients. Findings also support King's framework as a guide for examining the concept of perception in clinical practice.
      pubtype: Dissertation
      doctype:
        research
        Doctoral Dissertation
      ougenre: Unknown
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N