To Be in a Subject and Accident.
Boethius identifies beings that are in a subject with what the Scholastics called predicamental accident, and predication by accident with the predication of what is in a subject. The first of these questionable assimilations went on to become terminology commonly accepted by Scholastics of all eras...
| Publicado en: | Vivarium Vol. 53; no. 2-4; pp. 170 - 194 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=109940252&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 109940252 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00427543 C6F jtl: Vivarium issn: 00427543 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 53 iid: 2-4 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 109940252 10.1163/15685349-12341296 ppf: 170 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 964KB tig: atl: To Be in a Subject and Accident. aug: au: Gambra, José Miguel affil: Universidad Complutense de Madrid su: Accidents (Philosophy) Boethius, d. 524 Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Scholasticism (Theology) Predicate (Logic) Nominalism sug: subj: Accidents (Philosophy) Boethius, d. 524 Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Scholasticism (Theology) Predicate (Logic) Nominalism keyword: accident Aristotle paronymy predication to be in a subject ab: Boethius identifies beings that are in a subject with what the Scholastics called predicamental accident, and predication by accident with the predication of what is in a subject. The first of these questionable assimilations went on to become terminology commonly accepted by Scholastics of all eras. On the other hand, the second, which seems quite consistent with the thinking of Aristotle, was only admitted with many reservations, probably because of the bewildering claims of Aristotle in Cat. 5, 2a27-34 about the predication of what is in the subject. In what follows I will try to show how these phrases, properly understood, are consistent with the idea that what is in the subject is said by accident of the substance, although they implicate a difficulty poorly resolved by Boethius himself and those who followed him on this point, of whom I will only mention by way of example some Scholastics from the 16th century. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Vivarium is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Vivarium holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|