Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol.

Background: There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Implementation Science Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Squires, Janet E., Graham, Ian D., Hutchinson, Alison M., Michie, Susan, Francis, Jill J., Sales, Anne, Brehaut, Jamie, Curran, Janet, Ivers, Noah, Lavis, John, Linklater, Stefanie, Fenton, Shannon, Noseworthy, Thomas, Vine, Jocelyn, Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 9/29/2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110052318&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 110052318
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17485908
        38MN
      jtl: Implementation Science
      issn: 17485908
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 9/29/2015
      vid: 10
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110052318
        110052318
        NLM26416206
        110052318
        10.1186/s13012-015-0325-y
        NLM26416206
        PMC4584460
        110052318
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol.
      aug:
        au:
          Squires, Janet E.
          Graham, Ian D.
          Hutchinson, Alison M.
          Michie, Susan
          Francis, Jill J.
          Sales, Anne
          Brehaut, Jamie
          Curran, Janet
          Ivers, Noah
          Lavis, John
          Linklater, Stefanie
          Fenton, Shannon
          Noseworthy, Thomas
          Vine, Jocelyn
          Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
        affil: School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Personnel
          Study Design
          Diffusion of Innovation
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based Administration
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Qualitative Studies
          Attitude to Health
          Funding Source
          Human
      ab: Background: There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions.Methods/design: A multi-phased investigation of context using mixed methods will be conducted. The first phase is a concept analysis of context using the Walker and Avant method to distinguish between the defining and irrelevant attributes of context. This phase will result in a preliminary framework for context that identifies its important domains and their features according to the published literature. The second phase is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 13 studies of interviews with 312 healthcare professionals on the perceived barriers and enablers to their application of research evidence in clinical practice. These data will be analyzed inductively using constant comparative analysis. For the third phase, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with key health system stakeholders and change agents to elicit their knowledge and beliefs about the contextual features that influence the effectiveness of implementation interventions and healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice. Results from all three phases will be synthesized using a triangulation protocol to refine the context framework drawn from the concept analysis. The framework will then be assessed for content validity using an iterative Delphi approach with international experts (researchers and health system stakeholders/change agents).Discussion: This research program will result in a framework that identifies the domains of context and their features that can facilitate or hinder: (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. The framework will increase the conceptual clarity of the term "context" for advancing implementation science, improving healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice, and providing greater understanding of what interventions are likely to be effective in which contexts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N