One Size May Not Fit All: The Need for a More Inclusive and Intersectional Psychological Science on Stigma.
In their review, Remedios and Snyder () articulated how models of stigma fall short of explaining stigmatization of women of color, because they do not consider intersectionality of multiple stigmatized identities. Using the example of the intersection of race and gender, they reviewed literature on...
| Publicado en: | Sex Roles Vol. 73; no. 9-10; pp. 384 - 391 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=110138801&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 110138801 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03600025 SXR jtl: Sex Roles issn: 03600025 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2015 vid: 73 iid: 9-10 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 110138801 10.1007/s11199-015-0491-z ppf: 384 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 192KB tig: atl: One Size May Not Fit All: The Need for a More Inclusive and Intersectional Psychological Science on Stigma. aug: au: Williams, Stacey Fredrick, Emma affil: Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City 37614 USA su: Social stigma Women of color Intersectionality Social psychology research Human research subjects Identity (Psychology) Attribution (Social psychology) Prejudices Social classes Sexual minorities Social conditions of women sug: subj: Social stigma Women of color Intersectionality Social psychology research Human research subjects Identity (Psychology) Attribution (Social psychology) Prejudices Social classes Sexual minorities Social conditions of women keyword: Recruitment Research methodology Stigma Recruitment Research methodology Stigma ab: In their review, Remedios and Snyder () articulated how models of stigma fall short of explaining stigmatization of women of color, because they do not consider intersectionality of multiple stigmatized identities. Using the example of the intersection of race and gender, they reviewed literature on how targets of stigma detect and respond to prejudice (making prejudice attributions, the role of identity processes such as centrality), highlighting the complexity of these processes once multiple identities (namely non-prototypical categories of race and gender) are considered. In response, we provide more in depth discussion of the challenges to inclusion and intersectionality including current and traditional psychological science approaches and the perceived politicization of intersectional research, as well as the complexity of integrating multiple identities (social class, sexual orientation and gender diversity) into stigma research, including recruitment, measurement, and analysis. We offer practical suggestions in the areas of recruitment, measurement, and analysis, to facilitate more inclusive and intersectional research, given that such work would provide a more complete understanding of the experience of stigma. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|