Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI.

Objectives: To investigate the added value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on the diagnostic accuracy of PIRADS reporting and the assessment of cancer aggressiveness.Methods: Multi-parametric MRI and histopathological outcome of MR-guided biopsies of a consecutive set of 130 patients were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 25; no. 11; pp. 3187 - 3200
Autores principales: Litjens, Geert, Barentsz, Jelle, Karssemeijer, Nico, Huisman, Henkjan, Litjens, Geert J S, Barentsz, Jelle O, Huisman, Henkjan J
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110164622&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 110164622
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2015
      vid: 25
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110164622
        110164622
        NLM26060063
        110164622
        10.1007/s00330-015-3743-y
        NLM26060063
        PMC4595541
        110164622
      ppf: 3187
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for determining cancer aggressiveness in prostate MRI.
      aug:
        au:
          Litjens, Geert
          Barentsz, Jelle
          Karssemeijer, Nico
          Huisman, Henkjan
          Litjens, Geert J S
          Barentsz, Jelle O
          Huisman, Henkjan J
        affil: Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, 766, Postbus 9101 6500HB Nijmegen The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Prostatic Neoplasms Pathology
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Statistics and Numerical Data
          Diagnosis, Computer Assisted Statistics and Numerical Data
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Biopsy, Needle Methods
          Prostatic Neoplasms Classification
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Prospective Studies
          Aged
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Male
          Contrast Media
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Treatment Outcomes
          ROC Curve
          Pharmacokinetics
          Neoplasm Grading
          Middle Age
          Scales
          Aged, 80 & over
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
      ab: Objectives: To investigate the added value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on the diagnostic accuracy of PIRADS reporting and the assessment of cancer aggressiveness.Methods: Multi-parametric MRI and histopathological outcome of MR-guided biopsies of a consecutive set of 130 patients were included. All cases were prospectively PIRADS reported and the reported lesions underwent CAD analysis. Logistic regression combined the CAD prediction and radiologist PIRADS score into a combination score. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy and correlation to cancer grade. Evaluation was performed for discriminating benign lesions from cancer and for discriminating indolent from aggressive lesions.Results: In total 141 lesions (107 patients) were included for final analysis. The area-under-the-ROC-curve of the combination score was higher than for the PIRADS score of the radiologist (benign vs. cancer, 0.88 vs. 0.81, p = 0.013 and indolent vs. aggressive, 0.88 vs. 0.78, p < 0.01). The combination score correlated significantly stronger with cancer grade (0.69, p = 0.0014) than the individual CAD system or radiologist (0.54 and 0.58).Conclusions: Combining CAD prediction and PIRADS into a combination score has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, such a combination score has a strong correlation with cancer grade.Key Points: • Computer-aided diagnosis helps radiologists discriminate benign findings from cancer in prostate MRI. • Combining PIRADS and computer-aided diagnosis improves differentiation between indolent and aggressive cancer. • Adding computer-aided diagnosis to PIRADS increases the correlation coefficient with respect to cancer grade.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N