Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: a critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal”.
Are racial slurs always offensive and are racial stereotypes always negative? How, if at all, are racial slurs and stereotypes different and unequal for members of different races? Questions like these and others about slurs and stereotypes have been the focus of much research and hot debate lately,...
| Publicado en: | Language Sciences Vol. 52; pp. 139 - 155 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Nov2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110216021&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 110216021 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03880001 JM3 jtl: Language Sciences issn: 03880001 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2015 vid: 52 pid: 2410 pub: Elsevier B.V. artinfo: ui: 110216021 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001 ppf: 139 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: a critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal”. aug: au: Croom, Adam M. affil: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, 619 Williams Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, 433 Cohen Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States su: Racism in language Stereotypes Equality Epithets Work environment Acquisition of data sug: subj: Racism in language Stereotypes Equality Epithets Work environment Acquisition of data keyword: Philosophy of language Pragmatics Re-appropriation Semantics Slurs ab: Are racial slurs always offensive and are racial stereotypes always negative? How, if at all, are racial slurs and stereotypes different and unequal for members of different races? Questions like these and others about slurs and stereotypes have been the focus of much research and hot debate lately, and in a recent article Embrick and Henricks (2013) aimed to address some of the aforementioned questions by investigating the use of racial slurs and stereotypes in the workplace. Embrick and Henricks (2013) drew upon the empirical data they collected at a baked goods company in the southwestern United States to argue that racial slurs and stereotypes function as symbolic resources that exclude minorities but not whites from opportunities or resources and that racial slurs and stereotypes are necessarily considered as negative or derogatory irrespective of their particular context of use (pp. 197–202). They thus proposed an account of slurs and stereotypes that supports the context-insensitive position of Fitten (1993) and Hedger (2013) yet challenges the context-sensitive position of Kennedy (2002) and Croom (2011). In this article I explicate the account of racial slurs and stereotypes provided by Embrick and Henricks (2013), outline 8 of their main claims, and then critically evaluate these claims by drawing upon recent empirical evidence on racial slurs (both in-group and out-group uses) and stereotypes (for both whites and blacks) to point out both strengths and weaknesses of their analysis. Implications of the present analysis for future work on slurs and stereotypes will also be discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|