ONTOLOGINĖS HERMENEUTIKOS KONTROVERSIJOS: PRAKTINIS ASPEKTAS.

This paper discusses two versions of ontological hermeneutics. One concept of ontology is represented by Hans-Georg Gadamer, and another is represented by two Italian thinkers - Luigi Pareyson and Gianni Vattimo. These three philosophers share a belief that in post-metaphysical thought ontology is p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 88; pp. 54 - 66
Autor principal: Daraškevičiūtė, Vaiva
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110259081&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 110259081
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 88
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui: 110259081
      ppf: 54
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: ONTOLOGINĖS HERMENEUTIKOS KONTROVERSIJOS: PRAKTINIS ASPEKTAS.
      aug:
        au: Daraškevičiūtė, Vaiva
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Religijos studijų ir tyrimų centras, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      sug:
      keyword:
        conflict
        dialogue
        interpretation
        ontological hermeneutics
        practical philosophy
        understanding
        dialogas
        interpretacija
        konfliktas
        ontologinė hermeneutika
        praktinė filosofija
        supratimas
      ab:
        This paper discusses two versions of ontological hermeneutics. One concept of ontology is represented by Hans-Georg Gadamer, and another is represented by two Italian thinkers - Luigi Pareyson and Gianni Vattimo. These three philosophers share a belief that in post-metaphysical thought ontology is possible only as practical hermeneutics. However, the Italian philosophers Pareyson and Vattimo attain the practical approach in a different way than Gadamer. This paper states that the views herewith distinguished, i.e., those of Gadamer and Pareyson-Vattimo, are different in two aspects. The first difference is related to the manner these authors construct their concepts of hermeneutics. Gadamer sees hermeneutical ontology as a universal theory of understanding, whereas according to Pareyson and Vattimo we encounter a theory of interpretation. This aspect supposes the second point by which the distinction between the position of Gadamer and that of Pareyson and Vattimo becomes even clearer. The second difference is related to the manner they describe the praxis itself. In Gadamer's philosophy hermeneutical praxis is, first of all, the dialogue which leads to understanding, whereas for Pareyson and Vattimo the hermeneutical praxis means the conflict.
        Straipsnyje aptariami du ontologinės hermeneutikos modeliai - pirmajam atstovauja Hanso Georgo Gadamerio filosofija, antrajam - dviejų italų mąstytojų: Luigi Pareysono ir Gianni Vattimo, hermeneutika. Šiuos tris filosofus vienija įsitikinimas, kad postmetafiziniame mąstyme ontologija įmanoma tik kaip praktinė hermeneutika, tačiau italų filosofai Pareysonas ir Vattimo savo hermeneutikos praktinę nuostatą pagrindžia eidami kitu keliu nei Gadameris. Straipsnyje teigiama, kad praktinės filosofijos požiūriu Gadamerio bei Pareysono ir Vattimo ontologinės hermeneutikos modeliai skiriasi dviem aspektais. Pirmasis skirtumas susijęs su pačia hermeneutikos traktuote - Gadamerio hermeneutika yra supratimo teorija, o Pareysono ir Vattimo ontologijoje hermeneutika traktuojama kaip interpretacijos teorija; antrasis susijęs su skirtingo veikimo modelio pasirinkimu - Gadamerio hermeneutikoje nusistatoma veikti dialogo būdu, o Vattimo ir Pareysono hermeneutikos praxis yra konfliktas.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N