Imagen de Portada
Código QR

„RADIKALI" ABEJONĖ DESCARTES'O FILOSOFIJOJE.

Descartes' corpus is generally considered to be a watershed between scholastic and modern philosophy. According to common opinion, Cartesian method of radical doubt, the one presented and practiced in Descartes' philosophical works, discloses new horizons to the mind - it allows to reach indubitable...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 88; pp. 80 - 95
Autor principal: Saulius, Tomas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110259083&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 110259083
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 88
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110259083
        10.15388/Problemos.2015.88.8480
      ppf: 80
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.5MB
      tig:
        atl: „RADIKALI" ABEJONĖ DESCARTES'O FILOSOFIJOJE.
      aug:
        au: Saulius, Tomas
        affil: Lietuvos sporto universiteto, Sveikatos, fizinio ir socialinio ugdymo katedra, Sporto g. 6, LT-44221 Kaunas
      sug:
      keyword:
        Descartes'as
        epistemologija
        metodas
        radikali abejonė
        skepticizmas
      ab:
        Descartes' corpus is generally considered to be a watershed between scholastic and modern philosophy. According to common opinion, Cartesian method of radical doubt, the one presented and practiced in Descartes' philosophical works, discloses new horizons to the mind - it allows to reach indubitable certainty from the "first-person-perspective", without appealing to the unverifiable hypotheses about the relation of the subject of perception to perceptual objects. This paper argues that such an approach to Cartesian philosophy is superficial. The deeper insight reveals both explicit and implicit presuppositions of Descartes, which in the practice of the radical doubt remain unquestionable and, moreover, eventually are established as fundamental principles of worldview or norms of rational thinking.
        Descartes'o kūriniai paprastai laikomi takoskyra tarp scholastinės ir Naujųjų laikų filosofijos. Vyrauja nuostata, kad šiuose kūriniuose pristatytas ir praktikuojamas radikalios abejonės metodas atveria naujus minties horizontus - leidžia pasiekti neabejotiną tikrumą, laikantis „pirmojo asmens perspektyvos" ir nesiremiant iš principo nepatikrinamomis prielaidomis apie suvokiančio subjekto santykį su suvokimo objektais. Straipsnyje mėginama parodyti, kad toks požiūris į kartezinę filosofiją yra gana paviršutiniškas. Įdėmesniam žvilgsniui atsiskleidžia tiek „eksplicistinės", tiek „implicistinės" Descartes'o presupozicijos, kurios, praktikuojant radikaliąją abejonę, lieka jo nekvestionuotos ir, maža to, ilgainiui įtvirtinamos kaip fundamentalūs pasaulėžiūriniai principai ar racionalios mąstysenos normos.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N