ARGUMENTATION, R. PAVILIONIS'S MEANING CONTINUUM AND THE KITCHEN DEBATE.

In this paper, I propose a logical-cognitive approach to argumentation and advocate an idea that argumentation presupposes that intelligent agents engaged in it are cognitively diverse. My approach to argumentation allows drawing distinctions between justification, conviction and persuasion as its d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 88; pp. 95 - 114
Autor principal: Lisanyuk, Elena
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110259084&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 110259084
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 88
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui: 110259084
      ppf: 95
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 3MB
      tig:
        atl: ARGUMENTATION, R. PAVILIONIS'S MEANING CONTINUUM AND THE KITCHEN DEBATE.
      aug:
        au: Lisanyuk, Elena
        affil: St. Petersburg State University, Mendeleevskaya liniya 5, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia
      su:
        Debate
        Cognitive ability
        Idea (Philosophy)
        Meaning (Psychology)
        Cognition
      sug:
        subj:
          Debate
          Cognitive ability
          Idea (Philosophy)
          Meaning (Psychology)
          Cognition
      keyword:
        abstract argumentation frameworks
        cognitive diversity
        Pavilionis's meaning continuum
        the Kitchen Debate
        abstrakčios argumentacinės struktūros
        kognityvinė įvairovė
        prasmės kontinuumas
        virtuvės diskusija
      ab:
        In this paper, I propose a logical-cognitive approach to argumentation and advocate an idea that argumentation presupposes that intelligent agents engaged in it are cognitively diverse. My approach to argumentation allows drawing distinctions between justification, conviction and persuasion as its different kinds. In justification agents seek to verify weak or strong coherency of an agent's position in a dialogue. In conviction they argue to modify their partner's position by means of demonstrating weak or strong cogency of their positions before a 'rational judge'. My approach to argumentation employs a 'light' version of Dung's abstract argumentative frameworks. It is based on Stich's idea of agents' cognitive diversity the epistemic aspect of which is argued to be close to Pavilionis's conception of meaning continuum. To illustrate my contributions I use an example based on the Kitchen Debate (1959) between Khrushchev and Nixon.
        Straipsnyje pateikiamas loginis-kognityvinis požiūris į argumentaciją ir teigiama, kad argumentacija suponuoja, jog į ją įsitraukę protingi veikėjai pasižymi kognityvine įvairove. Autorės prieiga leidžia įvesti skirtis tarp pagrindimo, įtikinimo ir įkalbėjimo kaip skirtingų argumentacijos rūšių. Pagrindimo atveju veikėjai siekia verifikuoti savo pozicijos dialoge stiprų arba silpną koherentiškumą. Įtikinimo atveju veikėjų tikslas yra pakeisti parnerių poziciją įrodant savosios pozicijos silpną ar stiprų įtikimumą idealizuoto „racionalaus teisėjo" akivaizdoje. Autorės prieiga pasitelkia P. M. Dungo abstrakčių argumentacinių struktūrų versiją. Ji paremta St. Sticho kognityvinės įvairovės idėja, kurios episteminis aspektas yra artimas R. Pavilionio prasmės kontinuumo koncepcijai. Dėstomas požiūris iliustruojamas pavyzdžiu, paremtu virtuvės diskusija, vykusia tarp N. Chruščiovo ir R. Niksono 1959 metais.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N