A comparison of two rapid whole-blood tests and laboratory serology, in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Objective: To compare two rapid whole-blood serology tests for Helicobacter pylori and a laboratory serology assay against a gold standard.Design: Prospective comparison of tests in 81 patients.Setting: A hospital rapid access endoscopy clinic.Participants: Dyspeptic patients requiring assessment of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Vol. 11; no. 8; pp. 863 - 866
Autores principales: Hawthorne, A. Barney, Morgan, Shirley, Westmoreland, Diana, Stenson, Rachel, Thomas, Gareth A. O., Newcombe, Robert G., Hawthorne, A B, Morgan, S, Westmoreland, D, Stenson, R, Thomas, G A, Newcombe, R G
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Aug1999
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110640224&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 110640224
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0954691X
        8CE
      jtl: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
      issn: 0954691X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug1999
      vid: 11
      iid: 8
      pid: 5086
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110640224
        110640224
        NLM10514118
        110640224
        10.1097/00042737-199908000-00009
        NLM10514118
        110640224
      ppf: 863
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A comparison of two rapid whole-blood tests and laboratory serology, in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.
      aug:
        au:
          Hawthorne, A. Barney
          Morgan, Shirley
          Westmoreland, Diana
          Stenson, Rachel
          Thomas, Gareth A. O.
          Newcombe, Robert G.
          Hawthorne, A B
          Morgan, S
          Westmoreland, D
          Stenson, R
          Thomas, G A
          Newcombe, R G
        affil: Departments of aMedicine, and bMedical Microbiology and Public Health, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff; and cMedical Computing and Statistics, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Helicobacter Infections Blood
          Helicobacter Infections Diagnosis
          Helicobacter Pylori
          Serologic Tests Methods
          Isotopes
          Urea Metabolism
          Helicobacter Pylori Metabolism
          Prospective Studies
          Middle Age
          Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
          Adult
          Human
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Aged
          Evaluation Research
          Gastric Mucosa Microbiology
          Adolescence
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Breath Tests
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Aged, 80 & over
      ab: Objective: To compare two rapid whole-blood serology tests for Helicobacter pylori and a laboratory serology assay against a gold standard.Design: Prospective comparison of tests in 81 patients.Setting: A hospital rapid access endoscopy clinic.Participants: Dyspeptic patients requiring assessment of H. pylori status.Interventions: Measurement of H. pylori antibody status by Quickvue One-step, Helisal, and Premier H. pylori test; 13C urea breath test for H. pylori, and gastric biopsies for histology, culture and rapid urease test.Main Outcome Measure: Sensitivity and specificity of Quickvue One-step, Helisal and Premier tests, compared to a gold standard based on 13C urea breath test, biopsy culture, histology and urease test.Results: The Quickvue assay has significantly greater sensitivity (81%) than Helisal (67%), but without appreciable loss of specificity (86% and 93%, respectively). The Premier laboratory assay is significantly more sensitive than both of the rapid blood tests (96%), with comparable specificity to the Quickvue assay.Conclusion: The rapid serology tests used in this study are quick and convenient to use, but do not approach the sensitivity of a laboratory assay in detecting H. pylori status in this group of dyspeptic patients attending an endoscopy clinic.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N