Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS): Validity and Responsiveness.

Background. Although preliminary studies have established a good psychometric foundation for the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) for a broad population of youth with disabilities, additional validation is warranted for young children. Objective. The stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physical Therapy Vol. 95; no. 11; pp. 1559 - 1569
Autores principales: Dumas, Helene M., Fragala-Pinkham, Maria A., Rosen, Elaine L., Lombard, Kelly A., Farrell, Colleen
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Nov2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110682193&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 110682193
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00319023
        PTH
      jtl: Physical Therapy
      issn: 00319023
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2015
      vid: 95
      iid: 11
      pid: 10398
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110682193
        110682193
        110682193
        10.2522/ptj.20140339
        NLM26023220
        110682193
      ppf: 1559
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS): Validity and Responsiveness.
      aug:
        au:
          Dumas, Helene M.
          Fragala-Pinkham, Maria A.
          Rosen, Elaine L.
          Lombard, Kelly A.
          Farrell, Colleen
        affil: Research Center for Children With Special Health Care Needs, Franciscan Hospital for Children, 30 Warren St, Boston, MA 02135 (USA)
      sug:
        subj:
          Instrument Validation
          Concurrent Validity
          Computerized Adaptive Testing
          Psychometrics
          Motor Skills Disorders Diagnosis
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Infant, Newborn
          Infant
          Reliability and Validity
          Psychological Tests
          Scales
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
          P-Value
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Outpatients
          Hospitals, Pediatric Massachusetts
          Massachusetts
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background. Although preliminary studies have established a good psychometric foundation for the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) for a broad population of youth with disabilities, additional validation is warranted for young children. Objective. The study objective was to (1) examine concurrent validity, (2) evaluate the ability to identify motor delay, and (3) assess responsiveness of the PEDI-CAT Mobility domain and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Methods. Fifty-three infants and young children (<18 months of age) admitted to a pediatric postacute care hospital and referred for a physical therapist examination were included. The PEDI-CAT Mobility domain and the AIMS were completed during the initial physical therapist examination, at 3-month intervals, and at discharge. A Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to examine concurrent validity. A chi-square analysis of age percentile scores was used to examine the identification of motor delay. Mean score differences from initial assessment to final assessment were analyzed to evaluate responsiveness. Results. A statistically significant, fair association (rs=.313) was found for the 2 assessments. There was no significant difference in motor delay identification between tests; however, the AIMS had a higher percentage of infants with scores at or below the fifth percentile. Participants showed significant changes from initial testing to final testing on the PEDI-CAT Mobility domain and the AIMS. Limitations. This study included only young patients (<18 months of age) in a pediatric postacute hospital; therefore, the generalizability is limited to this population. Conclusions. The PEDI-CAT Mobility domain is a valid measure for young children admitted to postacute care and is responsive to changes in motor skills. However, further item and standardization development is needed before the PEDI-CAT is used confidently to identify motor delay in children <18 months of age.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N