Bakhtin and the actor (with constant reference to Shakespeare).

The Bakhtin we know best is something of a lyricophobe and theatrophobe. This is surprising, since he loves the act of looking. His scenarios rely on visualized, collaborative communion. He cares deeply about embodiment. Does he care about the tasks that confront the actor? Not the improvising clown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in East European Thought Vol. 67; no. 3/4; pp. 183 - 208
Autor principal: Emerson, Caryl
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110694982&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 110694982
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09259392
        GGL
      jtl: Studies in East European Thought
      issn: 09259392
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2015
      vid: 67
      iid: 3/4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110694982
        10.1007/s11212-015-9238-1
      ppf: 183
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 509KB
      tig:
        atl: Bakhtin and the actor (with constant reference to Shakespeare).
      aug:
        au: Emerson, Caryl
        affil: Princeton USA
      su:
        Bakhtin, M. M. (Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich), 1895-1975
        Theater history
        Phenomenology
        Tragedy (Drama)
        Oedipus at Colonus (Play : Sophocles)
      sug:
        subj:
          Bakhtin, M. M. (Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich), 1895-1975
          Theater history
          Phenomenology
          Tragedy (Drama)
          Oedipus at Colonus (Play : Sophocles)
      keyword:
        Actor
        Bakhtin
        Oedipus
        Shakespeare
        Theatre
        Topographical stage
        Tragedy
      ab: The Bakhtin we know best is something of a lyricophobe and theatrophobe. This is surprising, since he loves the act of looking. His scenarios rely on visualized, collaborative communion. He cares deeply about embodiment. Does he care about the tasks that confront the actor? Not the improvising clown of carnival (carnival is theater only in the broad sense of performance art), but the trained artist who performs a play script on stage? In discussing these questions, this essay draws on two suggestive places in Bakhtin's writing where he addresses the actor's art. One is from the mid-1920s; the other (1944), is on Shakespearean tragedy. If Bakhtin has a theatrical imagination, it will be found here. His grasp of an actor 'living in' to a role and his comments on the evolution of the European stage cast his better-known ideas of dialogue, comedy, seriousness and the sacred into unexpected perspective.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Studies in East European Thought is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Studies in East European Thought
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N