Aiming for a representative sample: Simulating random versus purposive strategies for hospital selection.

Background: A ubiquitous issue in research is that of selecting a representative sample from the study population. While random sampling strategies are the gold standard, in practice, random sampling of participants is not always feasible nor necessarily the optimal choice. In our case, a selection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Research Methodology Vol. 15; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: van Hoeven, Loan R., Janssen, Mart P., Roes, Kit C. B., Koffijberg, Hendrik
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 10/23/2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110701188&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 110701188
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14712288
        1CI1
      jtl: BMC Medical Research Methodology
      issn: 14712288
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 10/23/2015
      vid: 15
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110701188
        110701188
        NLM26497748
        110701188
        10.1186/s12874-015-0089-8
        NLM26497748
        PMC4619525
        110701188
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Aiming for a representative sample: Simulating random versus purposive strategies for hospital selection.
      aug:
        au:
          van Hoeven, Loan R.
          Janssen, Mart P.
          Roes, Kit C. B.
          Koffijberg, Hendrik
        affil: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Blood Transfusion Statistics and Numerical Data
          Decision Making
          Computer Simulation
          Selection Bias
          Patient Selection
          Sample Size
          Random Assignment
          Hospitals
          Data Collection
          Human
      ab: Background: A ubiquitous issue in research is that of selecting a representative sample from the study population. While random sampling strategies are the gold standard, in practice, random sampling of participants is not always feasible nor necessarily the optimal choice. In our case, a selection must be made of 12 hospitals (out of 89 Dutch hospitals in total). With this selection of 12 hospitals, it should be possible to estimate blood use in the remaining hospitals as well. In this paper, we evaluate both random and purposive strategies for the case of estimating blood use in Dutch hospitals.Methods: Available population-wide data on hospital blood use and number of hospital beds are used to simulate five sampling strategies: (1) select only the largest hospitals, (2) select the largest and the smallest hospitals ('maximum variation'), (3) select hospitals randomly, (4) select hospitals from as many different geographic regions as possible, (5) select hospitals from only two regions. Simulations of each strategy result in different selections of hospitals, that are each used to estimate blood use in the remaining hospitals. The estimates are compared to the actual population values; the subsequent prediction errors are used to indicate the quality of the sampling strategy.Results: The strategy leading to the lowest prediction error in the case study was maximum variation sampling, followed by random, regional variation and two-region sampling, with sampling the largest hospitals resulting in the worst performance. Maximum variation sampling led to a hospital level prediction error of 15%, whereas random sampling led to a prediction error of 19% (95% CI 17%-26%). While lowering the sample size reduced the differences between maximum variation and the random strategies, increasing sample size to n = 18 did not change the ranking of the strategies and led to only slightly better predictions.Conclusions: The optimal strategy for estimating blood use was maximum variation sampling. When proxy data are available, it is possible to evaluate random and purposive sampling strategies using simulations before the start of the study. The results enable researchers to make a more educated choice of an appropriate sampling strategy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N