Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.
Objectives: To investigate the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) and the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. The overall aim was to find out if the ABVS is applicable to daily clinical practice.Methods: Qualifying st...
| Publicado en: | European Radiology Vol. 25; no. 12; pp. 3638 - 3648 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=110814234&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 110814234 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09387994 NPH jtl: European Radiology issn: 09387994 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2015 vid: 25 iid: 12 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 110814234 110814234 NLM25916389 10.1007/s00330-015-3759-3 NLM25916389 110814234 ppf: 3638 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Diagnostic performance of the automated breast volume scanner: a systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. aug: au: Meng, Zheying Chen, Cui Zhu, Yitong Zhang, Shuling Wei, Cong Hu, Bin Yu, Li Hu, Bing Shen, E. affil: Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, No. 600 Yishan Road Shanghai 200233 China sug: ab: Objectives: To investigate the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) and the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. The overall aim was to find out if the ABVS is applicable to daily clinical practice.Methods: Qualifying studies were retrieved from Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Biosis Preview, CBM disc and by manual search and reference lists up to 30 September 2014. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of ABVS were calculated and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.Results: Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and seven studies were included in the systematic review of inter-rater reliability/agreement of ABVS. For 'diagnostic accuracy', the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were 92 % (95 % CI 89.9-93.8), 84.9 % (82.4-87.0), 6.172 (4.364-8.730), 0.101 (0.075-0.136), and 72.226 (39.637-131.61), respectively. For the studies of inter-rater reliability/agreement, the quality was heterogeneous and no evidenced result can be pooled.Conclusions: Sensitivity and specificity of ABVS for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions were high. More sound studies focusing on inter-rater reliability/agreement of ABVS, which deeply affect the clinical utilization and generalization of ABVS, are urgently needed.Key Points: • ABVS has high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions. • The quality of published inter-rater reliability studies is heterogeneous. • Empirical evidence concerning the inter-rater reliability/agreement for the ABVS is rare. • Comparison studies on ABVS and other medical imaging examinations are warranted. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|