Comparative evaluation of the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs: UnGraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt.

The use of evidence-based practices in education has been gaining a lot of attention in recent years. Researchers often use meta-analyses to identify evidence-based practices. To conduct meta-analyses of studies employing single-subject experimental research (SSER) designs for the purpose of identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 55; pp. 159 - 167
Main Authors: Rakap, Salih, Rakap, Serife, Evran, Derya, Cig, Oguzcan
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier B.V. Feb2016 Part A
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=111011652&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 111011652
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07475632
        JC4
      jtl: Computers in Human Behavior
      issn: 07475632
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2016 Part A
      vid: 55
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111011652
        10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.008
      ppf: 159
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparative evaluation of the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs: UnGraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt.
      aug:
        au:
          Rakap, Salih
          Rakap, Serife
          Evran, Derya
          Cig, Oguzcan
        affil:
          Department of Special Education, College of Education, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
          Dumlupinar Primary School, Carsamba, Samsun, Turkey
          Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, UK
          Department of Early Childhood Education, College of Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
      su:
        Commercial product evaluation
        Comparative studies
        Computer software
        Meta-analysis
        Research evaluation
        Medical coding
      sug:
        subj:
          Commodity Contracts Dealing
          Commodity Contracts Brokerage
          Computer and software stores
          Software publishers (except video game publishers)
          Computer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers
          Computer, computer peripheral and pre-packaged software merchant wholesalers
          Commercial product evaluation
          Comparative studies
          Computer software
          Meta-analysis
          Research evaluation
          Medical coding
      keyword:
        Data extraction programs
        DigitizeIt
        GraphClick
        Reliability and validity
        Single-subject experimental research designs
        UnGraph
        Data extraction programs
        DigitizeIt
        GraphClick
        Reliability and validity
        Single-subject experimental research designs
        UnGraph
      ab: The use of evidence-based practices in education has been gaining a lot of attention in recent years. Researchers often use meta-analyses to identify evidence-based practices. To conduct meta-analyses of studies employing single-subject experimental research (SSER) designs for the purpose of identifying evidence base for a practice, a necessary step is to obtain raw data from published graphs. One method for obtaining raw data from published SSER graphs is the use of computer programs specifically designed to extract data from graphs. Purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of three data extraction programs, Ungraph, GraphClick, and DigitizeIt, using 60 graphs obtained from 15 SSER studies focused on a practice. Three coders extracted data from the graphs using the three programs. Values extracted by each coder were compared to (a) each other (reliability) and (b) values reported in the original articles in which the graphs were obtained from (validity). Results showed that raw data from SSER graphs can be obtained reliably using all three data extraction programs and values obtained using the three programs are highly valid. These results suggest that researchers can use data extracted using these programs with a high level of confidences while conducting meta-analyses of studies employing SSER designs. Authors make recommendations for improving the accuracy of data extraction using the three programs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N