Some common errors of experimental design, interpretation and inference in agreement studies.

We signal and discuss common methodological errors in agreement studies and the use of kappa indices, as found in publications in the medical and behavioural sciences. Our analysis is based on a proposed statistical model that is in line with the typical models employed in metrology and measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Statistical Methods in Medical Research Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 920 - 936
Autores principales: Erdmann, T. P., De Mast, J., Warrens, M. J.
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Dec2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=111290220&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 111290220
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09622802
        31F
      jtl: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
      issn: 09622802
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2015
      vid: 24
      iid: 6
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111290220
        111290220
        NLM22232301
        111290220
        10.1177/0962280211433597
        NLM22232301
        111290220
      ppf: 920
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Some common errors of experimental design, interpretation and inference in agreement studies.
      aug:
        au:
          Erdmann, T. P.
          De Mast, J.
          Warrens, M. J.
        affil: Institute for Business and Industrial Statistics of the University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 12, 1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
      sug:
        subj:
          Study Design Standards
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Bias (Research)
          Observer Bias
          Reproducibility of Results
          Probability Sample
          Models, Statistical
      ab: We signal and discuss common methodological errors in agreement studies and the use of kappa indices, as found in publications in the medical and behavioural sciences. Our analysis is based on a proposed statistical model that is in line with the typical models employed in metrology and measurement theory. A first cluster of errors is related to nonrandom sampling, which results in a potentially substantial bias in the estimated agreement. Second, when class prevalences are strongly nonuniform, the use of the kappa index becomes precarious, as its large partial derivatives result in typically large standard errors of the estimates. In addition, the index reflects rather one-sidedly in such cases the consistency of the most prevalent class, or the class prevalences themselves. A final cluster of errors concerns interpretation pitfalls, which may lead to incorrect conclusions based on agreement studies. These interpretation issues are clarified on the basis of the proposed statistical modelling. The signalled errors are illustrated from actual studies published in prestigious journals. The analysis results in a number of guidelines and recommendations for agreement studies, including the recommendation to use alternatives to the kappa index in certain situations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N