Modes of consumption: From ‘what’ to ‘how’ in cultural stratification research.

In sociological debates about cultural stratification, a matter of dispute is whether Bourdieu's model of class-structured lifestyle differences has relevance for understanding contemporary social inequalities. According to Bourdieu's critics, the emergence and increasing pervasiveness of the cultur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Poetics Vol. 53; pp. 65 - 80
Autor principal: Jarness, Vegard
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Dec2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=111320561&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 111320561
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0304422X
        3P9
      jtl: Poetics
      issn: 0304422X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2015
      vid: 53
      pid: 1004
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111320561
        10.1016/j.poetic.2015.08.002
      ppf: 65
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Modes of consumption: From ‘what’ to ‘how’ in cultural stratification research.
      aug:
        au: Jarness, Vegard
        affil: Department of Sociology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7802, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
      su:
        Cultural capital
        Lifestyles
        Sociology
        Equality
        Criminal methods
        Poetics
      sug:
        subj:
          Cultural capital
          Lifestyles
          Sociology
          Equality
          Criminal methods
          Poetics
      keyword:
        Bourdieu
        Class
        Cultural omnivorousness
        Emerging cultural capital
        Modus operandi
        Taste
      ab: In sociological debates about cultural stratification, a matter of dispute is whether Bourdieu's model of class-structured lifestyle differences has relevance for understanding contemporary social inequalities. According to Bourdieu's critics, the emergence and increasing pervasiveness of the cultural omnivore have made this model outdated. This article argues that the notion of the cultural omnivore has led stratification research into an unfortunate cul-de-sac, characterised typically by unfruitful discussions about whether simplistic recasts of old maps fit current cultural terrains. The article makes the point that empirically investigating how people appropriate goods is at least as important as investigating what they prefer, consume or engage in. More specifically, liking the same things does not necessarily indicate similar tastes, as a given object can be appropriated in different ways. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 46 individuals located within different positions in the local class structure of the city of Stavanger in Norway, the analysis points to clear differences between ways of appropriating goods. Four distinct modes of consumption are identified: the intellectual mode, the luxurious mode, the educational mode and the practical mode. These modes of consumption are structured along class lines, i.e. consistent with the homology thesis.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N