Rethinking Sasanian Iconoclasm.

This article presents a detailed reconsideration of the well-established and canonized theory of "Sasanian iconoclasm" postulated by Mary Boyce in 1975. The Sasanians did not develop any prohibition against anthropomorphic representations of the gods, and in the surviving Zoroastrian literature and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 135; no. 3; pp. 471 - 499
Autor principal: SHENKAR, MICHAEL
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) Jul-Sep2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=111348462&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 111348462
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00030279
        JOY
      jtl: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      issn: 00030279
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul-Sep2015
      vid: 135
      iid: 3
      pid: 1463
      pub: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111348462
        10.7817/jameroriesoci.135.3.471
      ppf: 471
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 13.7MB
      tig:
        atl: Rethinking Sasanian Iconoclasm.
      aug:
        au: SHENKAR, MICHAEL
        affil: HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
      su:
        Iconoclasm
        Sassanid dynasty, Iran, 224-651
        Boyce, Mary
        Christianity
        Zoroastrian literature
        Zoroastrianism
      sug:
        subj:
          Iconoclasm
          Sassanid dynasty, Iran, 224-651
          Boyce, Mary
          Christianity
          Zoroastrian literature
          Zoroastrianism
      ab: This article presents a detailed reconsideration of the well-established and canonized theory of "Sasanian iconoclasm" postulated by Mary Boyce in 1975. The Sasanians did not develop any prohibition against anthropomorphic representations of the gods, and in the surviving Zoroastrian literature and inscriptions there is no evidence of either theological disputes over idols or of a deliberate eradication of them by the Persian kings. Sasanian cult was aniconic, but the historical and archaeological evidence clearly demonstrates that Sasanian visual culture was anything but iconoclastic. It seems that the Persian iconoclastic identity was constructed in the early Sasanian period as a response to the challenges posed by Christianity. By joining the common monotheistic discourse against idolatry, the Zoroastrian clergy adopted the conventions of the world in which they lived. Attacks against "idols" and "idolatry" should be understood in the context of internal and external polemical discourse against beliefs deemed to be erroneous by the Zoroastrian priesthood.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of the American Oriental Society is the property of American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      holder: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N