A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.

Classical statistical methods for analyzing exposure data with values below the detection limits are well described in the occupational hygiene literature, but an evaluation of a Bayesian approach for handling such data is currently lacking. Here, we first describe a Bayesian framework for analyzing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Annals of Occupational Hygiene Vol. 60; no. 1; pp. 56 - 74
Autores principales: Tran Huynh, Quick, Harrison, Ramachandran, Gurumurthy, Banerjee, Sudipto, Stenzel, Mark, Sandler, Dale P., Engel, Lawrence S., Kwok, Richard K., Blair, Aaron, Stewart, Patricia A.
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=111952942&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 111952942
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00034878
        JQ4
      jtl: Annals of Occupational Hygiene
      issn: 00034878
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2016
      vid: 60
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111952942
        111952942
        111952942
        10.1093/annhyg/mev049
        111952942
      ppf: 56
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
      aug:
        au:
          Tran Huynh
          Quick, Harrison
          Ramachandran, Gurumurthy
          Banerjee, Sudipto
          Stenzel, Mark
          Sandler, Dale P.
          Engel, Lawrence S.
          Kwok, Richard K.
          Blair, Aaron
          Stewart, Patricia A.
        affil: Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Occupational Exposure Evaluation
          Models, Statistical Methods
          Probability
          Survival Analysis
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Parametric Statistics
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Classical statistical methods for analyzing exposure data with values below the detection limits are well described in the occupational hygiene literature, but an evaluation of a Bayesian approach for handling such data is currently lacking. Here, we first describe a Bayesian framework for analyzing censored data. We then present the results of a simulation study conducted to compare the β-substitution method with a Bayesian method for exposure datasets drawn from lognormal distributions and mixed lognormal distributions with varying sample sizes, geometric standard deviations (GSDs), and censoring for single and multiple limits of detection. For each set of factors, estimates for the arithmetic mean (AM), geometric mean, GSD, and the 95th percentile (X0.95) of the exposure distribution were obtained. We evaluated the performance of each method using relative bias, the root mean squared error (rMSE), and coverage (the proportion of the computed 95% uncertainty intervals containing the true value). The Bayesian method using non-informative priors and the β-substitution method were generally comparable in bias and rMSE when estimating the AM and GM. For the GSD and the 95th percentile, the Bayesian method with non-informative priors was more biased and had a higher rMSE than the β-substitution method, but use of more informative priors generally improved the Bayesian method's performance, making both the bias and the rMSE more comparable to the β-substitution method. An advantage of the Bayesian method is that it provided estimates of uncertainty for these parameters of interest and good coverage, whereas the β-substitution method only provided estimates of uncertainty for the AM, and coverage was not as consistent. Selection of one or the other method depends on the needs of the practitioner, the availability of prior information, and the distribution characteristics of the measurement data. We suggest the use of Bayesian methods if the practitioner has the computational resources and prior information, as the method would generally provide accurate estimates and also provides the distributions of all of the parameters, which could be useful for making decisions in some applications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N