Brief report: cervical cancer screening in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have had a pregnancy.

Background Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have lower cervical cancer screening rates than women without IDD. Key barriers to screening uptake include physician or caregiver assumptions that screening is unnecessary because women with IDD are not sexually active. Our obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 60; no. 1; pp. 22 - 28
Autores principales: Brown, H. K., Plourde, N., Ouellette‐Kuntz, H., Vigod, S., Cobigo, V.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=112057831&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 112057831
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09642633
        EUL
      jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
      issn: 09642633
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2016
      vid: 60
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        112057831
        112057831
        112057831
        10.1111/jir.12225
        112057831
      ppf: 22
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Brief report: cervical cancer screening in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have had a pregnancy.
      aug:
        au:
          Brown, H. K.
          Plourde, N.
          Ouellette‐Kuntz, H.
          Vigod, S.
          Cobigo, V.
        affil: Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto Ontario, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Cervix Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Cancer Screening
          Intellectual Disability
          Developmental Disabilities
          Healthcare Disparities
          Human
          Female
          Health Services Accessibility
          Comparative Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Prospective Studies
          Ontario
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Logistic Regression
          Population-Based Case Control
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Adolescence
          Pregnancy
          Cervical Smears
          Coding
          Income
          Rural Areas
          Data Analysis Software
          Urban Areas
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Female
      ab: Background Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have lower cervical cancer screening rates than women without IDD. Key barriers to screening uptake include physician or caregiver assumptions that screening is unnecessary because women with IDD are not sexually active. Our objective was to compare cervical cancer screening rates in women with and without IDD who had had a pregnancy. Method We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked Ontario (Canada) health and social services administrative data. We identified 20- to 64-year-old women with (N =5033) and without (N =527 437) IDD who had had a pregnancy. We examined the occurrence of cervical cancer screening between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2010. We compared screening rates in women with and without IDD using logistic regression, controlling for age, region of residence, neighbourhood income quintile and morbidity level. Results Women with IDD who had had a pregnancy were more likely than those without IDD to be young, to live in the lowest neighbourhood income quintile, to live in rural areas and to have high or very high morbidity. Even after controlling for these factors, women with IDD were less likely than women without IDD to be screened (67.7% vs. 77.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.65). Conclusions Even among women who have had a pregnancy and are therefore known to have been sexually active, women with IDD face significant disparities in cervical cancer screening. Strategies to promote equitable uptake of cervical cancer screening for women with IDD need to be implemented.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N